Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> any single or two-family residence. The proposed driveways appear to be located a minimum of <br /> . 10 feet from the property lines and would connect to the existing shared driveway; therefore the <br /> properties would continue to comply with this regulation, <br /> 2. Lot Coverage - Meets Requirement <br /> The requirement for the R-l: Single Family Residential District is a maximum of 25%. The <br /> proposed plans do not alter the lot coverage, and would continue to comply with this regulation, <br /> 3. Landscape Lot Area - Meets Requirement <br /> The requirement for R-l: Single Family Residential District is a Minimum Landscape Lot Area <br /> of 65%, The proposed plans show approximately 2,400 ncw square feet of impervious surface, <br /> together with the existing impervious surface, the properties would still be compliant with this <br /> regulation, <br /> Variance Criteria <br /> A. State Requirements <br /> . Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue hardship" <br /> as; <br /> ". "means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br /> allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the <br /> property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br /> character of the locality, Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br /> reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.., " <br /> B- City Requirements <br /> Section VIII, 0, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinance state that, <br /> "Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which arise <br /> because of the configuration of a particular parceL The condition shall not have becn created by <br /> the landowner. A variance or variances may be granted from specific provisions of this ordinance <br /> because such land factors as length of a side of a lot. the shape of the lot or the unusual terrain <br /> prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be pennitted without variance on <br /> a similar size lot located in the same district, but which 10\ has no unusual configuration, <br /> Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a vanance. In no case shall the granting of a <br /> \\Earlh\Pl:1nn111g\Planning Cascs\200S\05-09 Raij;;:icj and Sahot Dri\",,;wllY Variances. (P~_NDING)\02-02~()5 PC Report Rodliej <Ind Sahol <br /> . Driveway Variam:es_doc <br /> Page 30/7 <br />