My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 07-06-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 07-06-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:24 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:58:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> , <br /> , <br /> The applicant has requested that the Planning Commission review two actions for this property . <br /> which are (listed in the order that they will be reviewed): <br /> . Master and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) I Special Use Pelmit <br /> . Preliminary Plat <br /> Overview <br /> The applicant has proposed redeveloping the old City Hall I Public Works garage property into a <br /> 7 building, 30 unit office condominium complex. The property would utilize the existing <br /> driveway approach from Highway 96 and an existing access easement to Hamline Avenue. The <br /> plans show the 5 westernmost buildings (and units 1-19) as I-story and 2-story units with slab on <br /> grade construction. The remaiuing 2 buildings (units 20-30) would be 1 and 2-story walkouts <br /> which appear to be two stories from the front of the building, and the exposed basement makes <br /> the buildings appear to be 3 stories from the rear. Since the grade slopes downward to the <br /> northeast portion of the site, units 20-25 would have their front facing the west 8nd the rear (with <br /> walkout basements) facing the east. Units 26-30 would face to the south and have their rear with <br /> walkout basements facing the water retention pond and Highway 96. The exteriors of the <br /> buildings would be predominantly brick (on all four sides of the buildings, as per NB <br /> regulations), stucco on the upper gable roof ends, and wood pillars and columns. Roofmaterials <br /> are proposed as fiberglass shingles, The application also states that earth tone colors will be used <br /> (in the development). <br /> The applicant indicated the following proposed timeline for development: . <br /> Summer 2005 - Begin grading, installing utilities, and construction of storm water improvements, <br /> Begin construction on 3 buildings/]6 units (presumably units 15-30) <br /> Winter 2005/ <br /> Spring 2006 The 3 buildings/]6 units should be ready for occupancy <br /> Summer 2006 Begin construction on the remaining 4 buildingsl14 units (presumably units 1.14) <br /> (Wmter 2006/ <br /> Spring 2007'!) (Assuming occupancy for units 1.147 This is not stated in application) <br /> Master and Final PUD <br /> A Planned Unit Development (PUD) would be necessary for this proposal because it <br /> contemplates developing six pieces of property (subsequently consolidated into two tax parcels) <br /> in a unified manJ1er as 30 office condominiums with common area. In addition, the <br /> Neighborhood Business District section states that proposals should be presented in the spirit and <br /> intent of the Planned Unit Development provision of the Zoning Ordinance, The Planned Unit <br /> \\EarLh\Planning\Planning Ca,.es\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary PIal for Old City Hall & PW Site . <br /> (PEND1NG)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc <br /> Page 2 of18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.