Laserfiche WebLink
<br />---.--- <br /> ..'.' <br /> .' <br /> property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br /> character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br /> . reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance"," <br /> B. City Requirements <br /> Scction VIII, D, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinancc state that, <br /> "Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which arise <br /> because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have been created by <br /> the landowner. A variance or variances may be granted from specific provisions of this ordinance <br /> because such land factors as length of a side of a lot, the shape of the lot or the unusual terrain <br /> prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be permitted without variance on <br /> a similar size lot located in the same district, but which lot has no unusual configuration. <br /> Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a variance. In no case shall the granting of a <br /> variance impair the health, safety, comfort and general welfare oftlie public, nor will it bc <br /> contrary to the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or any other <br /> ordinance ofthc City." <br /> Variance Findin2s <br /> . Minnesota State Stature 462,357, subd. 6, rcquires that Cities consider Ihe following five matters <br /> when hearing requests for zoning ordinance variances. <br /> 1. Are the circumstances for which the variance is requested unique to the property? <br /> (YES) A limited number of properties, those properties in the southwest quadrant of <br /> Arden Hills could claim a hardship due to the lot dimensions; most of these lots predate <br /> Arden Hills becoming a City and the creation of Arden lIil1s' zoning, Thc applicant has <br /> a very narrow lot (65 feet wide) which also limits the applicant's ability to relocate the <br /> garage behind the principal structure and still have rcasonable access to the garage and <br /> provides little or no opportunity to attach a garage to the principal structure. <br /> 2. Would granting thc variance be in keeping with the spirit and inteut of the City's <br /> Zoning Ordinance? <br /> The stated Purpose and Intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance includes thirteen purposes, <br /> of those the following statements appear to be applicable: <br /> This ordinance is enacted for the following purposes: <br /> \\Metro-ine1.us\ArdcnHills\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-20 Ruppel Variance (PENDING)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC-05- <br /> 20.doc <br /> . Page 3 of6 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />