PCP 01-04-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

STAFF RECOMMENDATION . The Staff has reviewed this proposal in accordance with the variance criteria and believes hardship is present. "Ibe proposal to construct on addition onto the south side of the home is reasonable due to the lot characteristics, neighborhood and interior floor plan. The situation is unique due to the small lot area, frontage on two roadways, topography of the lot and character of the neighborhood. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance to the City Council subject to the following: I. The project must be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as part of the Variance application. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, will require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The variance shall automatically expire and become void one (1) year from and after the date on which the Council granted such approval if work on the project has not begun within that time period. OPTIONS I. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend approval with conditions. , Recommend denial with reasons fix denial. If the City denies the petitioners ~. . request, "it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request". 4. Table for additional information. DEADLINE FOR AGENCY ACTION: February 2, 2006 The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on December 2, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by February 2, 2006 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The City may with the petitioner's consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments I) Location Map 2) Statement ofrequest submitted by applicant 3) Submitted plans 4) Request for Comment . 3 -.---