Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 6. Lot Covered by Structure 25% <br /> 7. Min. Landscape Lot Area 65% <br />. 8. Minimum Building Setbacks <br /> (ft) <br /> Front yard 40 <br /> Rear Yard (Principle) 30 <br /> Rear Yard (Accessory) 10 <br /> Side Yard Interior - Principal <br /> (Minltotal both yards on lot) 10/25 <br /> Side Yard Interior - <br /> Accessory 10 <br /> Side Yard Corner 40 <br /> The proposed lots meet all area and dimensional requirements ofthe R-l Zone. Proposed <br /> Lot A is comparable to the size of the surrounding lots and proposed Lots Band Care <br /> slightly larger than average when compared to adjaccnt lots. None of the lots will require <br /> a variance for construction purposes. <br /> The existing structure on proposed Lot B meets all setback requiremcnts ofthc R-I Zone <br /> without the need for a variance. <br /> Proposed Lot A and Lot B will have access to a public road via Valentine Court. <br /> Proposed Lot C will continuc to use an access to Old US Highway 10. The applicant has <br /> submitted a lcttcr from Ramsey County Department of Public Works indicating that <br />. Parcel C can continue to access Old US Highway 10 but will need to acquire a right-ol~ <br /> way pcrmit prior to the construct or modification of the entrance. <br /> 2. Subdivision Ordinance - Meets Requirement with proposed conditions <br /> Section 1150.04 of the City Code lists the requirements for subdividing and/or <br /> consolidating previously platted property. Requirements that must be evaluated listed <br /> under Scction 1 ] 50.04 include <br /> I. Survey: A survey showing the existing and proposed lots, <br /> 2. Zoning Compliance: The parccls or tracts rcsulting from thc division or <br /> consolidation, as depicted in the surveyor registered land survey, shall not have an <br /> arca, dimensions or setbacks which are less than the minimum requirements <br /> specified for the zoning district in which the parcels or tracts are located in the <br /> zoning ordinance. <br /> 3. Public W clfarc: It is determined that the proposed division or consolidation will not <br /> be dctrimental to the public welfare or injurious to adjacent tracts in the area in <br /> which the subdivision tract is located. <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> Planning Commission Meetingfor February 1, 2006 <br />. \IMetro-incl.1JS'!flrdenhillsIPlanningIPlanning Cases\2006'106-00J Cfari(lge Minor SubdivisionlOJ 1 806 Claridge Minor Subdivision Reporl {O <br /> PCdoc Page 3 or 6 <br /> u~ <br />