PCP 03-01-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 1,2006 9 3. The appropriate building permits for the air handlers shall be obtained within one . ycar and construction shall be completed within two years or the permit shall expire. The Council may extend the expiration dates of this approval upon written application of the applicant. 4, The fencing shall be installed as proposed immediately after installation of the air handling units. 5. Any trees that have died since the initial development of the site must be replaced per landscape plans approved by staff no later than June 1, 2006. 6. The applicant shall be required to submit a noise mitigation plan in the future if the City receives complaints regarding noise generation by the unit and said complaints are validated by City Staff 7. Should the off-site parking that Celestica's employees are currently using become available or inadequate, Celestica shall reapply for a special use permit amendment to expand parking similar in nature to Planning Case 01-12a and 01-12b. These applications shall require City review under the standard review process for a special use permit amendment. 8. The air handling units shall be installed in accordance with the plans submitted. Minor modifications may be made to the plans subject to approval by the City Planner. Significant changes to the plans require review and approval through the Site Plan Review Process. Commissioner Thompson inquired about the parking. Charles Patterson, representative of Celestica explained the parking requests and requirements. . Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:28 p.m. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the request to come forward and make comment. There were no public comments made. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Commissioner McClung asked if the MPCA had been contacted concerning the noise regulations. Mr. Lehnhoffresponded staff was not able to get any confirmation from the MPCA in time for this meeting. Commissioner McClung stated he was concerned about the parking and insufficient parking. He stated they also had to consider the visual alld land use capability considering this was a gateway to the City. He noted the Chesapeake property was still not developed and he was concerned there would be improper screening to the adjoining properti es. Commissioner Modesette asked if the applicant had looked at locating the equipment on the roof. Mr. Patterson, applicant, rcsponded given the size and weight of the equipment, . it would require major structural modifications to the building and therefore they determined the best location would be on the ground. He noted the compressors would also create mechanical vibration which would generate noise and vibration within the building, which was an issue. 9 -- ---------..-----