CCP 01-07-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-------- - 1 C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission on December 4, I 1996 recommended approval of Planning Case #96-21, Minor Subdivision (Lot Split & .. Lot Consolidation), subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions of Planning Case 92-23; 2. Transfer of Tract C to Ramsey County so that it may be incorporated into Tony I Schmidt Park; , Combination of Tract Band D into a single parcel; J. I 4. The smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for as short as time as feasible; 5. Temporary ground cover, such as mulch, is used and permanent ground cover, such as sod, is established; I 6. Methods to prevent erosion and trap sediments are employed; 7. Fill is stabilized to accepted engineering standards, approved by the city engineer. 8. Provision of an erosion and sediment control plan with the building permit for I Tract B, for review and approval by the City Engineer; and 9. Construction of utilities to service Tract B shall be accomplished in a manner that will ensure full access to all parcels which have vehicular access onto Tract D. I D. Updates. None required. Case #96-23. Special Use Permit Amendment and Variance I Pi1e:rim House Unitarian Church. 1212 West Highwav 96 eI A. Request. The applicant is requesting approval ofa Special Use Permit (SUP) amendment to allow for the expansion of the Church, including the paving of the parking I lot to the rear of the building and a small parking addition to the tront of the building (Exhibit B). The applicant is also requesting a variance from the minimum setback requirement from adjacent residential uses (building and parking lot) and the minimum I landscape lot area requirement. B. Background. The applicant received a temporary Special Use Permit (Planning Case 71- I 5) for worship and educational services, subject to the plans submitted and approval by the Arden Hills Police Department and the Lake Johanna Fire Department. The applicant received a temporary Special Use Permit in Planning Case 72-34, subject to the previous I conditions and the "...permit to be void if they are forced to move". Given, "...that no problems have evolved or are anticipated" the applicant received a permanent Special Use Permit in Planning Case 73-31. The applicant received approval to install an I institutional identification sign in Planning Case 86-1. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission on December 4, I 1996 recommended approval of Planning Case #96-23, Special Use Permit Amendment & Variances, subject to the following conditions: I Compliance with the letter from the City Engineer, dated November 21, 1996; 1. .. 2. Approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District; I