Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> DRAFT I <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 31. 1997 2 , <br /> I <br />Councilmember Malone remarked that the City would still require a $40,000 use of PIR Fund .. <br />balance even if Hamline and Snelling were both dropped this year. If both streets were included <br />as planned, the use ofPIR Fund balance would be between $200,000-$300,000. He stated he is <br />not comfortable with funding projects on such a negative basis. He suggested the possibility of I <br />doing one street this year, and one in 1998. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski suggested dropping Hamline for this year, as there are other I <br />concerns with that particular street. <br />Councilmember Keirn also expressed concern regarding the use of PIR Fund balance, and I <br />suggested dropping both streets and instead include them in next year's construction plans. <br />Mayor Probst stated he also prefers dropping both streets at this time. He expressed concerns I <br />about the project costs, and suggested attaching these streets to future projects, which may save <br />the City money. I <br />MOTION: Keirn moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to remove Hamline and Snelling <br /> A venues from the pavement management project for 1997. The motion carried 3- I <br /> I-I, with Aplikowski dissenting and Hicks abstaining. <br />Mayor Probst opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. " <br />Mayor Probst reviewed the purpose of the hearing was to establish street assessment rates, and <br />establish the roll of assessments both over and under $3,500. He stated there will be an overview I <br />of the pavement management program, and Council will first be allowed to ask questions. The <br />hearing will then be opened to the public, going first by the sign-in sheet, and as time allows, <br />anyone else who wishes to speak. I <br />Mayor Probst requested verification of the public hearing process. Mr. Brian Fritsinger, City I <br />Administrator, verified a public hearing notice had been sent to each affected property owner, <br />and a notice had been published in the Bulletin on March 5, 1997 and March 12, 1997. <br />A. Resolution #97-13, Establishing the 1997 Street Improvements Assessment Rates I <br />Mr. Terry Maurer of MSA Consulting Engineers presented an overview of the pending street I <br />improvements and the area they envelop. He stated M.S. 429 allows cities to assess costs of <br />street improvements to residents related to the increase in the value of the property. He stated an <br />appeal could be submitted at or before the meeting, and the appeal must be written and signed. I <br />Mr. Maurer gave an overview of the Arden Hills Assessment Policy, which states owners pay for <br />improvements to the streets adjacent to their property. Payment for property assessment is as I <br />follows: Residential, 50%; Commercial/Industrial, 75%; Tax-Exempt, 100%. He discussed the <br /> .. <br /> I <br />