Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . I <br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4. 1996 4 . <br /> .. <br /> Commissioner Sand inquired regarding the future of Tract B and whether it is buildable. Mr. <br /> Ringwald stated it has been previously determined that Tract B is buildable, even though it <br /> contains a steep slope. Commissioner Sand estimated a 40 foot elevation is involved. . <br /> Carlson moved, seconded by Sand to recommend approval of Planning Case #96-21, . <br /> Minor Subdivision (Lot Split and Lot consolidation), Dan Ashbach, 1585 Lake Johanna <br /> Boulevard, based on the rationale and conditions as outlined in the staffreport. The <br /> motion carried unanimously (5-0). . <br /> CASE #96-23 PILGRIM HOUSE UNITARIAN CHURCH. 1212 WEST HIGHWAY 96, <br /> SPECIAL USE PERMIT (SUP) . <br /> Chair Erickson gave an overview of the public hearing process, then opened the public hearing at <br /> 7:51 p.m. . <br /> Chair Erickson requested verification of the public hearing notice. Mr. Ringwald verified notice <br /> of the public hearing in the Focus on November 21, 1996. . <br /> Mr. Ringwald advised the applicant, Pilgrim House Unitarian Church, is requesting approval of a <br /> Special Use Permit (SUP) amendment to allow for the expansion of the Church, including the .. <br /> paving of the parking lot to the rear of the building and a small parking addition to the front of <br /> the building. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the minimum setback requirement . <br /> from adjacent residential uses (building and parking lot) and the minimum landscape lot area <br /> requirement. <br /> Mr. Ringwald advised the applicant received a temporary SUP for worship and educational . <br /> services as part of Planning Case #71-5 conditioned upon approval by the Arden Hills Police <br /> Department and Lake Johanna Fire Department. The applicant then received a permanent SUP . <br /> as part of Planning Case #73-31 and received approval to install an institutional identification <br /> sign as part of Planning Case #86-1. <br /> Mr. Ringwald reviewed the staff report regarding access, traffic circulation, parking, setbacks, . <br /> grading, Shore land Ordinance, landscaping, landscape lot area, and lighting. He noted the <br /> setback requirements 01'75 feet to the adjacent residential lot which makes this size of property . <br /> difficult to work with. Mr. Ringwald also reviewed variance criteria as contained in Section <br /> VIl,D,4,c, of the City Code and other Zoning Ordinance requirements and indicated the <br /> following findings support the conditions required for the granting of the requested variances: . <br /> 1. The applicant has compatibly operated the church since receiving its first Special Use <br /> Permit in Planning Case 71-5; . <br /> 2. The section of the Zoning Ordinance which prescribes the 75 foot setback for non- <br /> residential uses in residential districts applies to properties larger than one acre; .. <br /> . <br />