Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I' DRAFT <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 10. 1997 5 <br /> I Councilmember Aplikowski requested clarification of Ms. Turgeon's request, that what she was <br /> ~ <br /> asking was every time the applicant wished to construct a new deck or patio for a townhome that <br /> it would have to be approved by City Council. Ms. Turgeon stated that was her intent. <br /> I Council member Aplikowski inquired which decks or porches would be off the current property <br /> lines. Mr. Ringwald replied most of them extend into the common area. <br /> I Council member Aplikowski inquired regarding the measurement of the extension into common <br /> areas. Mr. Ringwald stated that the average encroachment appeared to be approximately four <br /> feet. <br /> I Mayor Probst requested clarification that the applicant was asking City Council for the maximum <br /> parameters for decks and porches. Mr. Ringwald clarified that this was the applicant's intent, as <br /> . he desires flexibility for potential buyers. <br /> I Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the maximum extension into common areas is <br /> approximately four feet. Mr. Ringwald replied this was an average amount. <br /> I Councilmember Hicks requested clarification that the overhead that Mr. Ringwald was currently <br /> showing was the same as what was approved by City Council on October I, 1995. Mr. Ringwald <br /> stated with the exception of the side and rear deck units, it was essentially the same plan that was <br /> Ie originally approved. <br /> Councilmember Hicks inquired if the footprint was the same also. Mr. Ringwald stated the <br /> I footprint was essentially the same as what was originally approved. <br /> Councilmember Hicks inquired if Units #7 and #8 were built according to the original plan. Mr. <br /> I Ringwald stated that was the case. <br /> I Dan Ogren, 475 Tanglewood Drive, Shoreview, developer, came forward to address the <br /> Council to clarify the footprint questions. He stated the building is the same as the plan that was <br /> originally approved, at 1750 square feet including porches and decks. He reiterated his desire to <br /> I offer flexibility to potential buyers. <br /> Councilmember Hicks requested clarification that the developer had not increased the footprint <br /> I of any of the buildings. Mr. Ogren stated he had not done so. <br /> Mayor Probst requested a vote on the current Motion on the table <br /> I The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> I <br /> f' <br /> I <br />