Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> DRAFT <br /> AEDEtl.l:llLLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 14. 1997 3 <br />-e MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adjust Lot 8, Block 2 to 110 front <br />. feet on the assessment roll. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />I Council was then requested to deal with the five remaining tabled objections. <br />I Mr. Post noted that Council had taken action on 8 of the 9 parcels on Resolution 97-14a, not <br /> including the Gallaghers at 4292 Norma Avenue. <br />I Mr. Filla questioned if any of those property owners filed objections, and if so, Council needed <br /> to rule on the objections raised. <br />. Mr. Post stated 1498 Royal Lane did file a written objection at the last Council meeting. <br /> MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to reconsider the previous motion. <br />I The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve the assessment roll for <br />I Lot 8, Block 2 changing to 110 front footage and denying the appeal for Lot 9, <br /> Block 2, accepting the appeal of Lot 10, Block 2 and adjusting front footage to <br /> 110 feet. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />.e Councilmember Keim questioned when calculating 4292 Norma A venue, was the short or long <br /> side of the lot used for the reclamation side. Mr. Stonehouse stated the short side, but actually <br />. the reclamation extended to both sides of the parcel. <br />I Councilmember Malone stated it was important to keep in mind the calculations were a <br /> mechanical process. He suggested Council look at the value to the properties. He would like to <br /> see the assessment amounts adjusted to make them more similar in dollar amounts. <br />I Councilmember Hicks stated there needed to be a valid basis for making adjustments. He <br /> reminded the Council that any adjustments make the cost to the City increase. The City <br />. Assessment Policy had been applied for other assessments in the past and the Council needed to <br /> be fair to all residents. <br />I MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to accept the appeals for 1375 <br /> Indian Oaks Trail, 1401 Indian Oaks Trail and 1389 Indian Oaks Court and revise <br /> using front footage of 110 front footage. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />I Councilmember Malone asked if 141 feet was used to calculate reclamation on 4292 Norma <br /> Avenue. Councilmember Hicks stated he believes 110 feet would be on the short side for this <br />. one, but would consider 120 frontage feet. <br />,. <br />I <br />