My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-28-1997
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCP 04-28-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:43 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:06:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ----- <br /> - <br /> DRAFT - <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 14, 1997 4 <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Keim seconded a motion to accept appeal of 4292 Norma e- <br /> A venue and adjust the assessment to 115 front feet. The motion carried . <br /> unanimously (5-0). <br />Mayor Probst noted this lot is halfreconstruction and half reclamation. Councilmember . <br />Aplikowski stated Council adjusted the footage on the other properties. Mr. Yargici wants to be <br />considered a comer lot using a method which would amount to approximately $1,000 less than . <br />the amount currently proposed to be assessed. <br />Mayor Probst asked Mr. Post what the assessment would be for 4294 Colleen Circle and Mr. . <br />Post stated $4,948.47. <br />Councilmember Hicks asked Mr. Stonehouse for the rationale used for this being calculated as an . <br />odd shaped lot. Mr. Stonehouse stated the determination was made to calculate it as an odd <br />shaped lot as prescribed in the Assessment Policy. 1 <br />Councilmember Hicks asked if the same amount of front footage was used for reclamation and <br />reconstruction. Mr. Fritsinger stated that they were not. Councilmember Hicks stated the I <br />proposed assessment of $3,663.44 is less than others in the same general area. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she believes the Council sheuld stay with the formula. .' <br />Mayor Probst suggested the average assessment be taken for half of the reclamation and half of <br />the reconstruction which would result in an assessment of approximately $3,700.00 . <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to deny appeal in the case of <br /> 1516 Colleen Avenue and set the assessment at $3,663.44. I <br />Mr. Yargici suggested 115 feet be used and noted his driveway is on Colleen A venue. Mayor <br />Probst noted when going through the process Colleen Circle was up for reclamation but the I <br />residents wanted reconstruction. <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to withdraw the previous I <br /> motion. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to accept the appeal and base the . <br /> assessment on half of 115 feet (reconstruction rate) and half of 115 feet <br /> (reclamation rate) for a total assessment of $3,546.95. I <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she will vote in favor of the motion but fears Council may be <br />setting a precedent. . <br />Mayor Probst stated this is a very unusual circumstance. Councilmember Hicks stated it does -- <br />not fit the definition for a comer lot. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.