Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION -MAY 3, 2006 2 <br />requirements of the underlying R-2 zone with three of the four lots morc than double the . <br />minimum lot size requircd for thc R-2 zone, With the recommended conditions, this <br />subdivision is unlikcly to have any negative impact on the City or the neighborhood. He <br />indicated while the City certainly prefened one driveway instead of four, the question <br />was whether a private drive should be permitted instead of the traditionally required <br />street and cuI-de-sac. He stated there was a precedent for using private streets in <br />developments; however, those examples can only be found in PUD's where private <br />streets were pemlitted. However, since this private street was unlikely to have a negative <br />impact on the neighborhood and since the cul-de-sac would aq,q:;coJ11paratively little value <br />to the City or the neighborhood, staff recommended approc\f<.iFofthe variance. The City <br />Engineer and Fire Marshal had reviewed the proposedBri~~&~ street and had not stated <br />any objections to the private driveway. --""', <br /> .'.'.. -'...:.........:..- <br /> -: ::-.:' <br />lIe stated once the preliminary plat was approvec1by the City, nO additional conditions <br />related to the design of the preliminary plat could be added. The final plat was simply a <br />review' process to ensure that the changes required in the preliminary plaflJad been made. <br />lIe recommcnded approval based on the following seventeen conditions: <br />L The applicant shall submit the final plat and application to the City of <br /> Arden Hills within three months of the preliminary plat approval date or <br /> the approval shall expire. . <br />2, The project shall be coml:ilet~tljflaccordancewith the plans submitted as <br /> part of the preliminary. plat)lI1d',Ylal-jance application. Any significant . <br /> changes to these plans,.,as:;tletemliri1'clby the City Planner, shall require <br /> review and approval by the, Plamling Commission. <br />3. The applicant shall include a 12-foot drainage and utility easement <br /> centered on all common lot/hnes, and a 12-foot drainage and utility <br /> easement along thc right-of~Way. <br />4. Thc applicant shall pay a park dedication fee as dctermined by the City <br /> 'lJ;,?uncil at the time the final plat is approved. <br />5, Tli~applieant shall amend the final plat to be in conformance with all of <br /> the'comments from the April 19,2006 memo from the City Engineer. <br /> . <br />6. Any extension of City services for the new lot shall be subject to review <br /> and appl'oval by thc City Enginecr and all associated costs shall be the <br /> responsibility of the applicant. <br /> control measures shall be installed before any grading or <br /> begins and shall be maintained and remain in place until <br /> is reestablished and construction is finished. <br />8. non-confoillling structures shall be renlOved as indicated on thc site <br /> plan before the final plat is filed and before any building permits arc <br /> issued. If, however, this is not possible, the developer shall post a <br /> financial surety with the City to ensure removal within one year from the <br /> approval of the final pIaL <br />9. A restrictive covenant shall be prepared by the applicant that is subject to <br /> approval by the City Attorney that requires all structures on Lots 2 and 3 <br /> to be setback at least 40 feet from the eastern lot line. The area from the . <br />