PCP 06-07-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 3, 2006 3 . eastern (front) lot line to 40 feet extending west from the eastern lot line shall be deemed the front yard for Lots 2 and 3. 10. The applicant shall suhmit an easemcnt agreement that grants pennanent access to the right-of-way across Outlot A for Lots I, 2, 3, and 4. The easement shaH be subject to approval by the City Attorney and filed with Ramsey County with the final plat 11. The applicant shall submit an approved road access permit from Ramsey County before the final plat is approved. 12. The dliveway shall be at least 20 feet wide anclii'l@ fcct clear in height as required by the Fire Marshal. ..J'" " 13. The applicant shall deposit into an cscroj!\;fa@'ffi."unt or submit a bond with the City Administrator a sum equal tAji~oncn~~r?d twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated cost of. tYt", road, "l!fJ)ity, and stormwater management improvcments to be constructed withinthesubdivision. The required improvements shall be installed and compJ",ti;d in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the applica'rtt.al1d'subject to approval by the City Engineer:1l1dyity Planner. The escro\'{or bond shall be returned upon completion ofth,,:project and final inspection and 14. approval from theCity Engineer.....: The applicant shiIlI..obtain any required "pcrnlits from the Rice Creek Watershed and supplylh",C:ity with a cop)',before any building permits are issued..:". .," ~:;":;!mm1f::;:: 15. Any changes to the gr~din5ii;j6t"~~W~I()t:\"s()ntrol plan shall be subject to . approvalby the City Engin"er. "",!: 16, The applicant shall provide an as-bunt survey upon completion of thc project 17. Tl1eapplicant shall comply Vi.ith applicable provisions of the City Code andt.elatedordinances. Commiss'i6herJ:;arson asked what hardship was involved with not putting in a City street with a cul-dc-sac."jMr. Lchnoff responded the applicant indicated the topography would be difficult for a cli1:.d'e-sac, andthc cul-de-sac would require more space. .. Commissioner Modesette asked if the water service to Lot I would be reused. Mr. Lehnhoff'responded Lot I and Lot 4 would retain their existing water & sewer connections:, Commissioner.Modesette asked if the rctaining wall would remain, or would it be rebuilt Mr. Lchnoff stated he believed the existing wall would remain, but applicant was here to respond to this question specifically. Commissioner Modesette asked if the City Engineer had looked at the pond to ensure it had enough capacity for the additional nmoff from this proposed development Mr. Lehnhoff responded the City Engineer had reviewed the drainage plan. He indicated the Rice Creek Watershed District would need to approve ofthis also, .