My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 06-07-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2006
>
PCP 06-07-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:13:58 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:07:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 3, 2006 4 <br />Commissioncr Modesette stated at the time of voting, she wonld abstain because she . <br />resided in this neighborhood. <br />Vice Chair Zimmenllan opened the public hcaring at 7:17p.m. <br />Vice Chair Zimmerman invited anyone for or against the request to comc forward and <br />make comment. <br />An email received by James Lelmoff from Bctty l-IelllleberiS?W2.Q;J7 Thom Court, dated <br />May 1, 2006, "Dear Sir: I am writing to you in rcgard t(),'J.lie public hearing to decide <br />Preliminary Plat & Variance to re'plat Lots 17 and l&II'RRBJeder's Home and Garden <br />Acres. 1 am a homeowner affected by this proposegwre-pfat~g~ unable to attend this <br />hearing because of my work schedule. 1 am opposedto thisT'~B.lating as this would <br />affect the wetland and wildlife area that this property is next to;'1~lffil~t part of it. The <br />added tratTic that seems to be happening in our once quiet little neighl}~tl1()od is changing <br />way to fast and I am conccrncd about the safety of minc as well as'th.\j,other young <br />children in the neighborhood. Thank you."!' <br />Phil Littlcfield, 6204 Orleans Lane, Maple Grove, applicant, was present for qucstions. <br />Vice Chair Zimme1111an inquired abouUhe diffcring lot sizes."Mr. Littlefield responded <br />one lot had an existing stmcture which wouldrcmain and the'other three lots would have <br />walk out style homes. He noted Lot 3 was coming off of Lot 4 and Lots 1 and 2 were <br />from the existing loL369~ New Brighton Road lot. . <br />,'''..:., <br />commissio!ll,~,,~~Zdicek!i~quired how much room was needed for a cul-de-sac. Mr. <br />LittlefIeld explaincd thc reaFon there was not enough room to put in a cul-de-sac and that <br />two of the lots would be eliminated if a cul-de-sac was added. <br />.. ............::.~..:... <br />Chair Modesetteaskedh9,w the private drive maintenance would be addressed. Mr. <br />Littlefield responded they were s~tting up a homeowner's association which would be <br />responsible for the maintenance of the driveway. <br />. <br />Commissioner Modescttc askcd if Mr. Littlefield had spoken with any of the neighbors <br />regardingthis project.Mr. Littlefield responded he had not <br />Commissioner Bezdieek asked if Mr. Littlefield had applied with the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District Mr. Littlefield responded he had. <br />Richard Oliveri us, 2029 Thom Comt, stated he was concerned with the privatc driveway. <br />Hc stated hc was also concerned about the homeowners' association and how much <br />control lour homes would have in a homeowners' association. He believed the City <br />Ordinances prevented this type of a development He stated he would like to see a cul- <br />de-sac put in instead of a shared driveway. <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.