CCP 09-22-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I vegetation on the USFWS property and the conservation easement which will assist in the fI screening of the buildings and the truck court yard between Phases III and IV. The Staff believes that the applicant should provide for additional landscaping (evergreen trees) in this area to make up for the lose of screening due to the revisions to the grading plan for the site. . 12. Proof of parking conflicts with pond on Phase 4 (plan Sheet CI.4). The tenant which the applicant is courting for Phase IV has parking requirements which are less than those I prescribed by the ordinance. In cases such as this the Zoning Ordinance (Section VI, F, I, f) allows for "proof-of-parking". The applicant is proposing 37 "proof-of-parking" spaces for Phase IV. However, 22 of these "proof-of-parking" spaces overlap the I ponding easement which is required for the storm water needs of Phase IV, 13. Modular retaining wall by others on Phase 4 should be by developer (plan Sheet C2.4). The plans provide for a modular retaining wall "by others". Since, the City's park . trail is just to the east of this location, the Staff assumes that this means that this will be the City's responsibility. Since, the retaining wall is needed for the grading of the site the Staff believes that the wall should be provided by the developer not the City, I 14. Outlet of pond on Phase 4 requires USFWS approval (plan Sheet C3.4). The storm water pond on Phase IV has an outlet structure which is not on the applicants property, it is on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) property. Therefore, the applicant I will need the approval of the USFWS for their proposed outlet structure for the storm water pond on Phase IV. 15. Vaughan Objection (Exhibit F). The City received the attached objection from Dan '- Vaughan regarding access to his property. The City Attorney has reviewed the objection and has informed Staff that it is his opinion that the proposed access provides reasonable access to the Vaughan property. Pursuant to City Council direction, the Staff has I contacted Naegele to discuss access from their site to enhance the redevelopment of the Vaughan property so that when a redevelopment plan is brought forth by Mr. Vaughan I the enhanced access can be provided for. REVISED Recommendation I The Staff would recommend approval of the request of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plan (including variances), final plat, and a street vacation to facilitate the construction of a three phase office/industrial project consisting of a 104,532 square foot building (Phase II), 115,575 I square foot building (Phase III), and a 102,360 square foot building (phase IV) on a 31.76 acre site zoned Gateway Business, subject to the following conditions: I 1. No issuance of occupancy permits for that part of the project (Phases II, III, and IV) greater than 200,000 square feet until such time that the relocated Round Lake Road is open for traffic and capable of accepting increased traffic. I 2. Compliance with the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. 3. Approval of and compliance with an NPDES permit by the MPCA. 4. Compliance with the City Engineer's letter dated June 24,1997, I 5. The smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for as short a time as feasible. 6. Temporary ground cover, such as mulch, is used and permanent ground cover, such as .. sod, is established. 7. Methods to prevent erosion and trap sediments are employed. I -------