Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> site for reloading. The addition of the proposed dock doors may help reduce congestion <br /> and truck idling on thc lot. <br />. On the Design Requirements of the B-4 Zone: <br /> 6. The mass of the site will not change and the color of the building has not been proposed <br /> to change. The existing color is similar to other buildings in the B-4 Zone. The proposed <br /> loading dock doors will be similar to the existing dock doors. <br /> On the Special Use Permit Evaluation Criteria: <br /> 7, The proposed modification will not reduce parking on the site. There is sufficient space <br /> for additional parking to accommodate all of the employees at the rear of the lot. The <br /> additional loading dock doors may reduce truck tranic congestion on the site due to better <br /> acccss to the warehouse and faster loading and un loading times, <br /> 8. The proposed modification is unlikely to produce any permanent increase in noise, glare, <br /> odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, or any other <br /> nuisance characteristics. Thcrc may be temporary dust or odors during construction. <br /> 9. The proposed modification will not affect drainage, The western portion of the lot drains <br /> toward Dunlap A venue and the eastem portion of the lot drains toward the rear of the lot, <br /> There are no known drainage issues and drainage will not be altered with this proposal. <br /> 10, The proposed use will not affect thc population dcnsity of the ncighborhood. <br /> 11, The proposed cxtcrior modifications to 3755 Dunlap Avenue will likely have a neutral <br /> affect on adjacent properties or the City as a whole, <br /> 12. The park dedication fee does not apply to this project, <br /> 13. The proposed modifications are in confoTInance with the requirements of the Zoning <br />. Ordinance. The proposed modifications are not in conflict with the Comprehensive <br /> Dcvelopment Plan. <br /> 14. The paint on the building has been stained by rust and the light on the south side ofthe <br /> building is broken. <br /> Resident Comments <br /> Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants <br /> in regard to this planning case. Howevcr, site plan reviews do not require a public hearing or <br /> public notice. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Bascd on the submitted plans and findings of fact, Staffrecommends approval of PI am ling Case <br /> #06-020 for the Site Plan Rcview to modify the exterior of3755 Dunlap Avenue. Staff <br /> rccommends the following six conditions be included with the approval: <br /> CIty ojArden Hills <br /> Planning Commission AleeringJor Ju(v ] 2, 2006 <br />. \V'vfetro-illet,us"llrrlenhifls',f'ltlllning',P!ollning Cases'120061.()()-(}20 Cil} Insulation site plan review (PENDING)!062806 PC report - Ciry <br /> Insularion Site Plan Re.'iew.nor Page 5 of6 <br />