My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 08-02-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2006
>
PCP 08-02-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:12 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:09:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 7. Grading and Utilities - Meets Requirement with conditions <br />. The City Engineer has reviewed the grading, drainage, and utility plans for the proposal, and <br /> those comments are attached. A condition rcquiring compliance with thc comments in thc <br /> letter are included as a condition for approval that must be completed before any building <br /> pernlits are issued. <br /> The City Enginecr also noted that permits must be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed <br /> District (RCWD) before any building permits are issued. <br /> 8. Screening & Noise - Meets Requirements <br /> The mechanical equipment for the building will be locatcd on the western side of the addition <br /> facing the Campus. The mcchanical equipment will be located on a portion of the existing <br /> building that is lower than the proposed addition, which means the addition will be screening <br /> the mechanical equipment <br /> The equipment, which will be more than 80 feet from the nearby residcntial properties, is not <br /> expected to bc detectible from adjacent properties. Although thc mechanical equipment will <br /> only bc visible from within the Campus, it may be visible from Cummings Drive and should <br /> be screened. <br /> 9. Additional Review <br />. The Fire Marshal and City Attorney have reviewed the proposal and do not have any <br /> comments. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposal and her comments arc in <br /> Attachment 3C-2. The Engineer's comments are primarily technical and do not significantly <br /> alter the proposed site plan. <br /> The Building Official noted that the Grading Plan (CI.O) indicates three handicap parking <br /> spaces arc provided for the building. However, the rest of the plans show two handicap <br /> parking spaces. The ADA rcquirement for this building would be four spaces. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> In Planning Case #06-024, Staffrecommcnds approval of the Planned Unit Development Master <br /> Plan (7th) Amcndment and Site Plan Rcview based on the submitted plans and findings of fact <br /> subject to thc following thirteen conditions: <br /> I. Thc applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of approval as stated in the <br /> approved Master Plan PUD except as amended by the six subsequent amendments. <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> Planning Commission Meetingfor August 2, 2006 <br />. \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\Q6-024 Boston Scientific PUD Amendment & Site Plan Review (PENDINC1)\071706- <br /> PC Report - Boston Scientific PUD AmendmenL for addition to Building ;-.J.doc <br /> Page 70f9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.