My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 08-02-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2006
>
PCP 08-02-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:12 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:09:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 12,2006 7 <br />. Phil Littlefield stated the retaining walls in the central part of the property wonld be <br /> removed. He stated one of the things that would make sense would be to take the garages <br /> out and see the eonditions of the wall and what needs to be replaced, which Mr. Gilbert <br /> was in agreement with. He stated they were happy to work with Mr. Gilbert. <br /> Commissioner Larson asked if he would agree to occupancy of new structure subject to <br /> approval ofthe grading. Mr. Littlefield responded they would bc in agreement with such <br /> a condition. <br /> Commissioner Modesette asked how the maintenance on the drainage pond would get <br /> handled in the future. Mr. Lehnhoff responded it would require a maintenance agreement <br /> filed with the final plat. He indicated that Rice Creek Watershed maintains those types of <br /> agreements. <br /> Mr. Paul Chrervey, Pioneer Engineering, stated Rice Creek Watershed does have a <br /> maintenance agreement that would get filed with the County as a part of their approval <br /> and they would share this with the City once it was approved. He noted they had <br /> previously made a submittal to Ramsey County regarding the driveway issue and had <br /> been infonned that they did not object to the two driveways. He believed it would be <br /> better to have two separate driveways for this proposed development. <br /> Chair Sand asked if they were looking at a shared driveway or not. He asked the <br />. applicant to speak about this. Mr. Littlefield stated they would be willing to withdraw <br /> their application for the variance for the shared driveway. The variance application is <br /> withdrawn. <br /> Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. <br /> Commissioner McClung thanked the applicant for talking to his neighbors and addressing <br /> their concerns and he believed this was a vastly improved plan. <br /> Chair Sand also thanked the applicant for working on this with the neighbors. <br /> Commissioner Modesette stated she would abstain from voting beeause she had a <br /> conflict. <br /> Commissioner McClung stated he would like a condition with respect to the retaining <br /> wall. <br /> Commissioner Larson stated the grading was the only issue he had a concern with as well <br /> as the next door neighbor and he believed review by the City Engineer of the drainage <br /> and grading plan should be contingent on the occupancy of any of the new dwellings <br /> construeted. He asked this be added as condition 17. Mr. Lehnhoff suggested the <br /> following wording: The certificate of occupancy for Lot I shall be continent upon <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.