PCP 09-06-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - AUGUST 2,2006 DRAFT 3 . L The fence plans shall be modificd so that the fence is no closer than twenty feet to the lot line corner that is near the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Amble Drive. Any significant cbanges to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. Thc applicant shall locate the utilities near the proposed fence before the fcnce permit is issued. The applicant shall comply with any setbacks set by the utility company, though the fence shall not be moved any closer to Lexington A venue or Amble Drive than the modified plans, 3. The fcncc shall not encroach on the public right-of-way. Thc applicant shall be responsible for locating the lot lines prior to the issuance of the fence permit. 4. Before the face of the fence is installed, the location of the posts shall be measured by the City Planncr to confirm that the posts arc in conformance with the fence plans as modified hy condition I. The applicant shall be responsihle for contacting the City Planner prior to the installation of the face of the fence. S. The applicant shall keep the fence maintained and promptly repaired if any damage occurs to thc fencc, including graffiti. 6. Thc applicant shall maintain the vegetation on both sides of the fcnce. 7. The fence shall not infringe on the lines of sight for Lexington Avenue and Amble Drive. The fence pernlit shall be subject to approval by Ramsey County to ensure that the lines of sight are protcctcd. If upon inspection the fence is found to impede sightlines, the fcncc shall be movcd farther from the intersection. . He not cd staff had not received any letters, emails, or telephone calls from thc property owncrs or occupants in regard to this planning case. Commissioner McClung moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to approve Planning Case No. 06-022, Greg Peterson, 1105 Amble Drive, subject to the seven conditions as noted in staffs July 17,2006 rcport. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). C. PLANNING CASE 06-024: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN REVIEW, BOSTON SClENTlHC, 4100 HAM LINE A VENUE NORTH Mr. Lehnhoff statcd thc applicant is proposing to construct a 10,225 square foot addition to the west sidc of Building N. He reviewed his analysis and recommended approval of the Planncd Unit Development Master Plan (7'h) Amendment and Site Plan Review based on the submitted plans and fIndings of fact and subject to the following conditions: L The applicant shall continue to ahide by the conditions of approval as stated in the approved Master Plan P1JD except as amended by the six subsequcnt amendments. 2. A PUD Amendment form, drafted by the City Attorney, shall amend the PUD and cncompass all seven amendments to the Master Plan PUD. A building pcrnlit may . only he issued after the PUD Amendment document receives the approval ofthe City Council and is executed by both the City Council and the applicant -- DRAFT --