Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — DECEMBER 8, 2025 2 <br />County staff shared that since the full implementation of the TGRS optimization work in 2023, <br />levels of contamination in the water being treated in Building 116 have decreased by <br />approximately 80%, leading to a decrease in air contaminant emissions from the air stripping <br />process. EPA and MPCA regulators have informally indicated that, based on the current models <br />and this optimization work, they are not concerned that current emissions would be a public <br />health risk and the Army remains obligated to complete updated emissions modeling and real- <br />time sampling, under regulatory supervision before any construction occurs at Rice Creek <br />Commons. <br />There is a collection of legal documents that govern all Army cleanup activities and any proposed <br />changes to the TGRS. The JDA reviewed details of a feasibility study. Options considered were <br />a simple analysis of in -place building modifications addressing aesthetics and screening or a more <br />comprehensive study that could include a wider range of options, such as a building size <br />reduction, modifications to the existing structure, energy capture opportunities, and potential on - <br />site or off -site location alternatives. JDA direction was a future Request for Proposals and <br />development agreement would list Building 116 as a preexisting condition. and the JDA will <br />begin the process of engaging with regulators on the potential for clean energy capture and <br />aesthetics. <br />Also at the work session, the JDA reviewed a summary of the Request for Information responses. <br />The RFI closed on November 14, 2025 and there were five responses received. The purpose of <br />the RFI was to gain information to inform a future solicitation for development partner(s) at Rice <br />Creek Commons. The JDA requested this agenda item be brought back in January for additional <br />discussion to clarify the role of a Developer in a future solicitation. Commissioners requested <br />that staff bring back information on considerations that would be needed for next steps for <br />deciding on having a Lead Developer or a Hybrid model. There was consensus of the JDA that <br />they intend to move quickly towards release of an RFP. <br />Next at the Regular meeting following the work session, the JDA approved their 2026 Budget and <br />reviewed their 2026 Road Map. <br />Lastly on December 4th there was a mediation that is part of the court schedule for the litigation <br />against Alatus Arden Hills, LLC. The mediation was not successful which means the litigation is <br />proceeding. I will also add that by the November 28th deadline, the City and County were not <br />added to the lawsuit. <br />There have been no advisory committee meetings and the next JDA meeting will be held on <br />January 5th. <br />Mayor Grant reported the December 4 mediation was not successful. He asked if future <br />mediations would be held with Alatus. <br />City Administrator Jagoe explained she did not have an answer for the Council at this time. She <br />reported the litigation was ongoing and continuous. <br />Mayor Grant inquired if Building 116 was owned by the Army. <br />City Administrator Jagoe indicated this was the case, but stated the building was on County <br />property. <br />