My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
01-12-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
2/4/2026 2:03:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — DECEMBER 8, 2025 8 <br />Finance Director Yang stated this item was presented to the City Council under agenda Item <br />10A. <br />Councilmember Holden responded to some of the public comments. She explained the Council <br />has been working to address the needs of the community while also investing in future <br />improvement projects. She asked if the City Council worked inflation into the proposed budget. <br />Finance Director Yang reported the City had inflation incorporated into the budget. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained his estimates include inflationary <br />expenditures. <br />Councilmember Holden discussed how significant budget increases from the Lake Johanna Fire <br />Department and Ramsey County Sheriff's Department were out of the City's control. She <br />reported the parks plan assisted the City with planning for the future. She commented on how it <br />was not important to her what other City's tax rates were, but rather she was focused on meeting <br />the needs of this community. She reported the dollars being transferred to the fire department <br />would cover the expense of the new station. She indicated the City could not make an early <br />payment on the bonds until year nine. She discussed how the City operates with a very lean mix <br />of staff members and noted the City needs staff members to complete inspections, code <br />enforcement as well as replacing the Community Development Director. She commented on how <br />the proposed step increases and raises were assisting the City with retaining staff members. <br />Mayor Grant stated the City could not pay off the bond before year nine. He explained the City <br />did not anticipate having $165,000 surplus each year from the franchise fees. He indicated the <br />City worked to get the number as close as possible to the bond payment. He reported the excess <br />funds would be going toward the fire department staffing increases. He commented further on <br />how the City Council and staff plan for upgrades and improvement projects in the community. He <br />discussed how Arden Hills was different from surrounding communities, noting Arden Hills does <br />not receive LGA or driver's license bureau revenues, nor does the City have a community center <br />to fund. He was of the opinion 18.3% was too high for the levy. <br />Councilmember Rousseau explained she would like to have more conversation around the <br />budget given the information the City Council now has regarding the 2025 surplus. She thanked <br />staff for the detailed information that was provided on the proposed levy at 15.97%. She stated <br />she had an interest in discussing a further reduction to the levy bringing it down to 13.97%. <br />Councilmember Monson commented she supported the tax levy being set at 13.97% which <br />included an allocation of $780,000 to the general fund reserves, pays for the permit software and <br />pays for the comp plan one time payments. She indicated supported using reoccurring revenues <br />for reoccurring costs. She discussed how a community has to be growing in order to have new <br />revenue streams coming in. She reported Arden Hills was a mature community, aside from Rice <br />Creek Commons. She explained she supported the City Council moving forward with a 13.97% <br />tax levy. <br />Mayor Grant addressed the statement that was made regarding the fact the City underfunded the <br />2025 budget. He discussed how the City ended up with a $900,000 surplus in funding which <br />meant the City had not overtaxed its residents. He supported the City being conservative with its <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.