My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
01-12-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2026 2:11:06 PM
Creation date
2/4/2026 2:03:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — DECEMBER 8, 2025 9 <br />revenue projections but stated it was safe to say the City's revenues could be increased by <br />$60,000 which would lower the levy by 1 %. <br />Councilmember Weber asked why the Mayor believed revenues were projected $60,000 lower. <br />Mayor Grant stated revenues were a projection and he understood there was one large project on <br />the horizon and larger projects help the City's revenues. <br />Councilmember Weber explained he was not interested in underfunding the budget for 2026. He <br />explained he could support moving forward with a reasonable and justified budget and tax levy <br />increase that would keep the City solvent. <br />Councilmember Rousseau reported the Mayor supported reducing the levy by at least 1% and <br />Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Weber supported reductions also. She suggested <br />the EDA levy be omitted and recommended the INET expenditure be paid down through the <br />surplus. <br />Councilmember Weber reported using the surplus would reduce the 2026 budget. He stated he <br />would be willing to cover the INET expenditure through the surplus. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the capital improvement fund has deficits over the next 10 years. <br />She indicated Ramsey County was changing the formula for what the City pays for sidewalks and <br />trails on County roads. She discussed how the PIR Fund would be needed to cover placeholder <br />items in the future but noted none of the items listed were guaranteed purchases. She explained <br />she was uncertain that should be able to approve the $300,000 loader expenditure. <br />Councilmember Weber questioned if the PIR Fund covered the purchasing of equipment. <br />Finance Director Yang reported the City had a separate fund for equipment. <br />Councilmember Weber inquired if the $300,000 loader was included in this budget. <br />Finance Director Yang stated the $300,000 loader was not included in the 2026 budget. <br />Mayor Grant commented this Council would need to have more detailed discussions regarding <br />the PIR Fund in early 2026. <br />Councilmember Monson strongly disagreed with the Mayor's comment noting the Council has <br />been discussing the future of the PIR Fund. She explained she supported Councilmember <br />Rousseau's recommendation to move forward with the tax levy at 12.97%. She stated she would <br />like to put a motion on the floor to this effect because she had to leave the meeting in ten minutes. <br />She was of the opinion the Council should be able to run its meetings and be done by 9:00 p.m. <br />Councilmember Holden commented the Council has put in hundreds of hours on the budget and <br />tax levy. She stated she would like to further discuss this topic. <br />Councilmember Weber asked for a point of order. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.