My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
02-09-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2026 11:22:22 AM
Creation date
2/17/2026 11:17:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 2. <br />This allows the city the opportunity to gather all the facts and make a <br />measured and fair response. You can find a sample Summary of Rules for <br />Public Comment in Appendix C of this memo for your city to use. <br />While many councils recognize the value of citizen input, citizen comment can <br />negatively affect meeting efficiency if not managed. For example, if a large <br />number of audience members wish to speak, the meeting may not progress <br />efficiently. Likewise, if one person spends a long time expressing their view, <br />others may not get the opportunity to present their views. The following <br />sections discuss ways to address some of these problems. <br />1. Limiting time <br />Some councils have addressed this problem by placing a limit on the amount of <br />time audience members are allowed to speak at a meeting. For example, the <br />council may ask people to limit their remarks to no more than three minutes <br />or allow only a specified amount of time for the whole comment period. Time <br />limits should be adopted in a policy, applied equally and neutrally to all <br />members of the public, and practiced consistently at every meeting. <br />2. Limiting topic <br />Another option may be to limit the scope of comments to those matters being <br />addressed by the council at the specific meeting. While this may be a way to <br />focus the meeting on the matters being addressed by the council, it might also <br />keep people from making the council aware of any new issues. Cities <br />considering this approach may want to consider other ways for people to bring <br />up other topics. Limits on topic should also be adopted in a policy and applied <br />equally and neutrally to all members of the public. <br />3. Advance written notice <br />As a third alternative, cities may choose to adopt policies that require advance <br />notice of a person's desire to address council. The notice usually must be <br />submitted in writing a few days before the actual meeting. The specific topic <br />and the speaker's name are then put on the agenda. Such procedures are <br />helpful in allowing the council to plan an efficient meeting. It also helps to <br />remind the speaker that they may only address those issues listed on the <br />notice. <br />B. Meeting disruptions and unruly citizens <br />A statutory city council is authorized to preserve order at its meetings. The <br />mayor, as the presiding officer, is also vested with some authority to prevent <br />disturbances. Home rule charter cities may have similar provisions in their <br />charters. <br />Minnesota <br />Mayors <br />Association <br />Chapter 1-20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.