My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCP 06-01-2005
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2004-2009
>
PC Packets 2005
>
PCP 06-01-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:19 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:17:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> , <br /> , <br /> hooded and also that lights shall not east light exceeding a meter reading of 1.0 foot . <br /> candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining <br /> residential property. <br /> Neighborhood Business District requirements state that parking lot lighting poles shall <br /> not be taller than 14 feet. Lighting shall not wash the building except for accent lighting <br /> to delineate the main entry to the building. <br /> Parking lot lighting is now proposed as l2-foot poles on a 2-foot base. The lighting plan <br /> shows lighting levels in excess of the City requirement of 0.4 foot candles along the south <br /> property line. The parking lot lights directly west of unit #20 and along the aceess road <br /> from Harnline A venue should have shields added to reduce the lighting levels to meet <br /> City regulations. Additionally, all lighting sources are required to he concealed. <br /> The elevation plans show an address sign with a light above it outside eaeh of the unit <br /> entryways. These lighting fixtures should be included in the photometric plans so that <br /> the overall lighting levels can be determined. <br /> A condition should be added to the PUD document that lighting cut sheets and revised <br /> photometric plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to <br /> the issuance of building permits. <br /> 13A. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities - Revised plans required as per comments of City <br /> Engineer regarding Grading, Drainage, and Utilities. . <br /> The City Engineer has made several reeommendations relative to grading, drainage, and <br /> utilities which are included in the Plan Review Comments section. <br /> The pond at the northeast eorner of the site could be a hazard to people using the trail on <br /> Highway 96 if they lost control of their bicycle. A decorative fence (like the wrought <br /> iron fence at the CSM property located at Cummings Park Drive and Lexington) should <br /> eliminate the possibility of a pedestrian accidentally falling into the pond, A eondition to <br /> this effect should be added to the PUD document. <br /> The applicant would also be required to obtain the necessary permits from the Rice Creek <br /> Watershed District in regard to drainage, erosion control, and stormwater. <br /> 14A. Plan Review Comments - Plan review comments received from the City Engineer, City <br /> Planner, Operations and Maintenance Department, City Building Official, Lake Johanna <br /> Fire Department. and Ramsey County <br /> a. Thc hydrant that is in fTont of Unit 15 should be moved NE of Unit 12. <br /> b. There is a possible need to add a hydrant near the front of Unit 25. <br /> c. Each FDC needs to be within 150 feet of a fire hydrant. <br /> d. FDC will need to be on front I address side of the buildings. <br /> \\Earth\Planning\planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site . <br /> (PENDTNG)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc <br /> Page 12 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.