Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — FEBRUARY 9, 2026 15 <br />Someone can pick the unit they want and if they are income qualified they pay the income qualified <br />rate, if not, they pay the standard market rate. <br />Mayor Grant said he doesn't think any two developments will ever be the same. In a PUD <br />environment the developer can ask for concessions on density or affordability. He asked if that was <br />correct. <br />Community Development Director Reilly said yes, unless there is a minimum density that can't <br />be met. The underlying zoning still applies. We would have to do something to allow for the <br />increase in density. <br />Mayor Grant said a PUD enables flexibility for both the developer and the city. <br />Community Development Director Reilly said for everything except for the number of units per <br />acre. <br />Mayor Grant said everything else can be negotiated. <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed. <br />Mayor Grant said if a developer is doing 167 units, why would they not make it a PUD? <br />Community Development Director Reilly said many cities don't allow them. <br />Mayor Grant said he wants that to be an option. <br />Councilmember Monson said the reason we are having this conversation is because we have <br />specifically been told that we can't ask for affordable housing in exchange for density, unless it's <br />in our ordinance. She asked if the drafted material today is middle of the road, is it aggressive? <br />Community Development Director Reilly said he went towards the more aggressive side. <br />Councilmember Monson assumes that will hold them to higher standards. They will have to do <br />more if they want to get more. She wants to have this but she doesn't want it to be super aggressive. <br />She would like to see it be more middle of the road. She doesn't want it to be so restrictive that they <br />just go to a different city. She asked if this is ready to move on and be reviewed'by the planning <br />commission. She asked if Director Reilly needs anything else from Council before he feels it's <br />ready for that review. She would like to move this to the planning commission quickly because she <br />thinks it may take them more than one meeting to discuss. <br />Councilmember Holden agrees the policy should be middle of the road. She asked what staff <br />would change in the information provided to make it a little less aggressive. She said this is just the <br />base. We can still demand more as part of a PUD. <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed. It's all negotiable. If we want this to go to <br />the Planning Commission in March, he would want to send it there with at least a 7.5% minimum <br />number of units for low income and workforce housing. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how increasing the lower income at 50% to 7.5% impacts it? <br />