My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2026-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
02-09-2026-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2026 2:34:53 PM
Creation date
3/10/2026 2:34:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — FEBRUARY 9, 2026 16 <br />Community Development Director Reilly said there is an argument that the region needs more <br />units at 50% or less so there is a higher need for that. Meaning we want that to be at the same level <br />as the others. Developers target market rate. The market rate is that 80-100% of the AMI. <br />Councilmember Holden said we want to make sure people aren't walking away from developing <br />here. She said this is more aggressive than Shoreview. <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed. <br />Councilmember Weber is willing to adjust the numbers in section 8.1. He recognizes that aiming <br />for 60% to get a density bonus is ideal, he doesn't think it's realistic. He thinks 80% is better. We <br />haven't seen one of these developments get fully vetted and reviewed with analyzing their finances <br />to determine how well they are coming out. Keeping densities at a moderate number allows the city <br />to get the benefits we want, through negotiation. <br />Mayor Grant doesn't want us to price ourselves out of the market by going over the top with <br />affordability. We need to be middle of the road. <br />Community Development Director Reilly said these percentages are options. It's not all in one. <br />They can pick more than one. He's hearing we don't want to incentivize anyone to produce income <br />units targeted to people who are below 50% of AMI. <br />Mayor Grant thinks we're starting to price ourselves out of the market when we're forcing that <br />into the equation. There are other communities that went in big-time and developers just don't try <br />in those communities. <br />Councilmember Weber asked for confirmation that if a developer comes in and offers <br />affordability with 5% of their units being 50% AMI, they qualify. They wouldn't also need to 7.5% <br />and 10%. If they come in with 10% of their units being 80% AMI, they qualify and don't need to <br />do the other two. <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed <br />Mayor Grant said he's still at 15%, 5% and 0%. <br />Councilmember Weber said if we put 0 in there that means they can do 0 at 50% AMI and still <br />qualify. <br />Mayor Grant is saying you would take that whole line item out. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would be willing to send this to the Planning Commission. She asked <br />if it would be valuable for them to also have the neighboring communities' markets, for them to <br />consider. <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed he can do that. <br />Discussion ensued regarding what the AMI in Arden Hills is. Median Family income in the metro <br />is $132,400. at the income at 80% AMI for a family of four is $104,200, 60% is $79,400 and 50% <br />is $66,200. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.