My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2026-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
02-09-2026-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2026 2:34:53 PM
Creation date
3/10/2026 2:34:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — FEBRUARY 9, 2026 17 <br />Councilmember Monson said she feels good sending this to the planning commission with the <br />explicit instruction that we are trying to be middle of the road. <br />Councilmember Weber said he likes the options on the table, as they are. <br />Community Development Director Reilly corrected his earlier statement to clarify that the <br />percentages as proposed are the same as Shoreview. The difference is the number of family -sized <br />units in a building. He increased the requirement for family -size units but created fewer options to <br />simplify things. <br />Councilmember Weber would like the question posed to the Planning Commission and see how <br />they feel about that, or if they express interest in expanding it. <br />Councilmember Holden said if we do 50% AMI at 5%, that's just more money that the City has <br />to come up with to help fund it, if somebody chose that. <br />Community Development Director Reilly said these are requirements. It's telling them they have <br />to do this, or nothing at all. If someone says they can't do it unless we give them money, we direct <br />them to the section that outlines what additional options they can do, in addition to what's required. <br />Councilmember Holden said if this goes to the Planning Commission she wouldn't want them to <br />change everything. What is the Planning Commission's job on this? <br />Community Development Director Reilly said they are tasked with making a recommendation to <br />City Council and Council can ultimately decide. <br />Councilmember Monson said Director Reilly can deliver the messages he heard here this evening. <br />Councilmember Weber doesn't think it would serve the Planning Commission to blow up an <br />ordinance like that. They watch the meetings. They put a lot of effort into helping us do what we <br />do. <br />Councilmember Holden didn't say they don't put in effort. She asked what their job is because <br />sometimes they become more of the policy makers when they give it to us, after we passed it to <br />them, and it comes back significantly changed. <br />Council had consensus to move this topic on to the Planning Commission. <br />D. Proactive Policing (added to the agenda) <br />Councilmember Holden said recently something showed up on the Ramsey County Sheriffs <br />Department reports called proactive visits. She asked City Administrator Jagoe to look into. She <br />said technically we are being billed for them to do their patrol. <br />Councilmember Weber added his wife stated this sounds like directed patrol. She is a supervisor <br />for Minneapolis 911. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.