My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
03-09-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 8:57:34 AM
Creation date
3/16/2026 8:44:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 31, 2026 16 <br /> <br />heard someone state that the City of Roseville implemented an ordinance so she would like to <br />look at the process they did. Staff can work on that and have something ready for the February 9 <br />meeting. She will also put something on the agenda about scheduling another meeting in <br />February. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden wondered if the evection item would include Arden Manor, being that it <br />is privately owned. <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe said that is a question she would want to flesh out. She will make sure <br />to get an answer to that question before the meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson would like to discuss the moratorium on detention centers. She would <br />love to take action on that, as soon as we can. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau said for the detention centers she would be interested in Staff going <br />through the list of website resources that a resident provided us, as well as, beefing up the website <br />and that information in there. There were other folks who brought some good ideas. In the interim <br />it is more of an administrative process. She would love Staff to prioritize that. She would like to <br />see removing Spring Hills Suites from being our representative for the Gateway Visitor Bureau as <br />a priority. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson supports all of those efforts. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber said he supports those, as well. He has a question on the moratorium. He <br />asked if it will be a resolution or if it will have to be heard by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe said she doesn’t believe it needs to be reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission but it is a city ordinance not zoning. We will need to look at our timeline for <br />adoption of an ordinance. We wouldn’t be able to meet the noticing requirements prior to the <br />February 9 meeting. She said she heard Council say they want a work session scheduled to <br />discuss the Twin Cities Gateway appointment. She asked if Council is wanting a work session <br />discussion or do they want it to be on the regular meeting, for a motion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau would like to see it on consent for the regular meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber thought we could invite them to come to the meeting and try to justify <br />their position. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson suspects they probably have a legal bind where they can’t deny service <br />to a certain group of people, based solely on the group they are in. It would be great to hear from <br />them on that. She said there is also the risk of retaliation from the federal government. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber said the representative has to be from a tourist hotel industry related <br />business. He said it is a fair point that if they can’t say no to them being there, is it fair to punish <br />them. <br /> <br />A member from the public asked if the hotel can be shut down until the surge is over. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.