My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
03-09-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2026 8:57:34 AM
Creation date
3/16/2026 8:44:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
459
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 31, 2026 17 <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson reminded that public comments are typically not taken during Council <br />discussion. She said this would be a portion of the work session discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden doesn’t think we can legally shut down a business. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding it not being necessary for them to come in and discuss their stance. <br />Council agreed the item to revoke the position on the Gateway Visitor Bureau board held by the <br />Spring Hills Suites employee should be a consent item at the next regular Council Meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if we can stop them from staging in the hotel parking lot. <br /> <br />City Attorney Land said we cannot prevent them from doing any activities inside or outside the <br />building. It’s private property. We can’t shut down a business because the City would be liable <br />for all of the revenue they would lose during that time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said we have also heard there is poor driving. Can we have a Ramsey <br />County Sheriff monitor that situation in the morning? <br /> <br />City Administrator Jagoe will pass that question on to the Sheriff. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson said Councilmember Weber shared this thoughts on the meeting they <br />had with RCSO. She, too, was comforted by the meeting. Their stance is to not help or hinder <br />federal activities. It gets complicated when you start talking about what is interference? What is <br />hinderance? She does not envy local law enforcement. They are trying to ensure that they are not <br />on the wrong side or are not doing the wrong thing. We are very clear about public safety. She <br />asked directly, if ICE busts into a school, will the Sheriff come. They said yes. That is a public <br />safety emergency. They will come to the school. There were a couple of scenarios that she <br />presented that they stated they wouldn’t respond to. That’s complicated; however, they are doing <br />the best to manage a very complex and ever moving situation. They stated there have only been <br />11 ICE-related phone calls in the last 10 days, from all of the seven contract cities combined. We <br />know there were more than 11 incidents in these seven cities in the past 10 days. The dispatchers <br />are now tracking calls when they are related to immigration. We will finally have a record of how <br />many reports come in. That is an incredibly important piece of information for us. Someone spoke <br />earlier about how history will remember this. Our history needs to show that our community <br />observed what ICE was doing and we reported it. It’s also important for us to understand how <br />much activity increases, over time. The increase in calls is a functional piece of information we <br />need to have because we pay the RCSO for their services. They will use their judgement and <br />policies to determine if a call warrants a sheriff’s response. Residents should definitely call to <br />report what they are seeing, to produce that record. If we’re considering joining the lawsuit that <br />Governor Walz and some of the cities are participating in, we need to have legal standing. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson said her call to action is to get these incidents on record. She said it is <br />important to understand the law and how it works. If there is a body cam and an incident happens <br />involving a resident, their home or their business, that entity can request the body cam footage. <br />The City cannot, if we weren’t part of what was happening. Once an investigation is triggered, the <br />information is locked down and no longer available, except to investigators. Noting the <br />immigration calls is an important move for RCSO so they can try to have control over their data <br />It’s important that residents keep the videos they have recorded. If we want to access more, <br />investigations can really limit it.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.