My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
03-09-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 2:04:41 PM
Creation date
4/14/2026 2:04:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MARCH 9, 2026 6 <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller said if we request a survey, that can be a question we <br />ask. This may be a good candidate for one of the mini master park plans to explore what people <br />want there. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said part of the process is the internal Public <br />Works and PTRC additional requests. We are bringing them to this meeting so Council can sift <br />through the items, so we don't have to re -explore items during the community engagement. We <br />want to focus people on the improvements that are directed by Council. If we want to step back and <br />do the mini master park plans, we would re -explore those items. <br />Councilmember Rousseau thinks Perry Park needs the most attention, if we're looking at doing a <br />mini master plan. <br />Councilmember Monson said she thinks the Ingerson is too low of an investment on that <br />playground set, based on what we saw at Arden Oaks and Freeway. Maybe there is a way to slide <br />some money around from a different park. Perry Park is in need of dog park upgrades and people <br />use that dog park a lot. She supports those improvements. She would like to see tree replacement <br />included when talking about removing trees. She asked if Staff can speak to prioritization or tiering <br />of the projects outlined. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how much we pay for the warming house at Hazelnut. She doesn't <br />think it's much for the season. <br />Mayor Grant thought $5,000. <br />Councilmember Holden said it doesn't have to be a permanent warming house up there. We can <br />get an affordable one that comes and goes with the seasons, and we don't have to maintain it. <br />Mayor Grant said we recently improved some other parks at a much higher cost. Arden Manor <br />still isn't finished. As we look at the add-ons, we can probably add 50% to those numbers, easily. <br />He said as was pointed out, Sampson isn't used as much as Ingerson. Maybe some dollars can be <br />moved to support better improvements at Ingerson. He asked if the playground equipment will be <br />replaced with the equivalent to what it has today or is it an upscale structure? <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said that number is not for an upscale structure. <br />Mayor Grant said we are replacing two playground structures at $260,000 each. Does that replace <br />what is there today? Is it bigger or smaller? <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said it will likely be about the same size as what is there <br />today. <br />Mayor Grant said when we purchase playground structures, we pay for removal and installation, <br />as part of the contract. Is there any way to save money by using the O and M guys to remove it? <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen understands the appeal of that. He doesn't <br />know if we would really save that much money that way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.