Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - <br /> .~ ~ i~ ;~ ~ <br /> 'rl' <br /> ~: , 'L), <br /> rUJ . < <br /> 11"'\1 iru U <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 30, 1998 ~ UU 4 <br />ML Nielsen stated there are no potholes on the roadway and asked why the City doesn't just . <br />repave it He reported he has contacted his Senators and several attorneys who advised him that <br />he can get an injunction against this project to stop it ML Nielsen asserted this project is a whim <br />and should not be approved, <br />CliffVennerstrom, 1901 Edgewater Avenue, inquired regarding the interest rate, Mayor <br />Probst stated this will be established with the next Council action, He advised that it has <br />historically been established at 8%, <br />George Evans, 1960 Edgewater Avenue, asked if the majority of the residents on affected <br />streets came to the City requesting this road project or irthe City and their experts decided this is <br />what the people need and want He asserted that, ultimately, the people should decide, <br />Mayor Probst explained how the City uses the Pavement Management Program to inspect streets <br />and rank them by a process to determine which should be reconstructed, overlaid, or seal coated, <br />He stated it is unfortunate that some streets have not historically received this type of <br />maintenance but the Council is now attempting to handle street improvements based on the <br />Pavement Management Program, <br />Mayor Probst reported on the discussion held last year regarding whether Oak A venue should be <br />reconstructed or overlaid but the Council decided an overlay would not be fiduciarily responsible <br />since it would not last, so the decision was made to reconstruct or do nothing and the residents <br />decided to proceed with the improvement. . <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked if this is an option for this street, if the majority ofresidents <br />do not support the improvement it could be removed from the 1998 Street Improvement Project <br />scope, She suggested the City Engineer provide an explanation of why this street is being <br />recommended for improvement even if there are no pot holes, <br />Mayor Probst explained that curbs and gutters preserve the street over a longer period of time, <br />because they direct surface water drainage, <br />The City Engineer explained that the process used in the past to determine whether an overlay <br />should be considered was a rating cutoff of between 60 to 80, He explained there is usually only <br />two to three inches of blacktop with poor soils underneath which is not the standard by which <br />streets are constructed today, The City Engineer stated the proposed reconstruction would <br />remove the asphalLand replace the base which will provide more strength to the roadwa-Y,Th~ . <br />concrete curbs will contain the edge of the pavement so it does not ravel off and allow water to <br />undermine the base, The City Engineer stated the entire City does not have a storm sewer system <br />so the curb and gutter will function to direct water drainage, He explained that Edgewater <br />A venue received a rating of 57 based on the age, frequency of cracks, and other issues which put <br />it into the reconstruction category, <br />Scott Hultberg, 1945 Edgewater Avenue, stated he had no comment. <br /> . <br />