Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f~.' ,,,','1'\ ,.'%' l'r <br />'" '~J . <br />2.J 10.\ 110\ ,I <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL _ MARCH 30.1998 : Ju IfU U U 5 <br /> <br /> <br />. Kerstin Leonard, 1954 Edgewater Avenue, stated they received notice the end of November <br />and were shocked, She stated they believe this was a short notice and suggested the City provide <br />a longer notification period to allow people to prepare, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the process followed now allows notice three to four months earlier than <br />provided in the past. He explained a three year program was identified to create an improvement <br />project where the roads are in close vicinity for cost benefit. Mayor Probst noted that Edgewater <br />A venue was on the list a year ago since it was included as a candidate for reconstruction, but it <br />did not proceed, <br /> <br />Britt Lundgren, 1977 Gramsie Road, stated she has a comer lot and asked if she will be <br />assessed again when the other road is improved, Mayor Probst explained that the corner lot <br />formula provides a credit so it is not a full assessment on the second side, <br /> <br />George Rehbein, 1759 Crystal Avenue, stated there is a five-year window on the application of <br />the corner lot formula street credit and, if it is more than five years, the resident has to pay for the <br />full assessment on both sides of the corner lot. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated this is correct. <br /> <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, Mounds View, stated she was invited to the meeting <br />tonight by several residents, She reported that the City of Mounds View just completed a street <br />. project and reviewed her past municipal service and citizen involvement with a group of <br />residents who received a different road outcome by working with the Mounds View City <br />Council. Ms. Haake reviewed her involvement in a road project and commented on the typical <br />view of Councils who wants to do what is best for the city by fiduciary judgement and the typical <br />resident's view that the council will do what they want whether it is best for the residents or not. <br /> <br />Ms. Haake stated in Mounds View it was proposed to construct a road at 32 feet wide with curb <br />and gutter at a $41.04 per front foot assessment. Most lots are 100 feet wide so the average <br />assessment would have been $4,100 per house, Residents wanted the road to be 24 feet wide <br />without curb and gutter. She advised of the action of a residents committee to counter the City's <br />direction and which groups they involved to challenge the City on this street project. <br /> <br />Ms, Haake cautioned the Council about future costs to maintain the roads the City is planning to <br />construct and eXplained how Mounds View found exceptions that can be made on MSA funded <br />roads to eliminate.C!Il:l1s and gutters from the road design, She reviewed the assessments charged <br />by Arden Hills for road projects over the past few years, Ms, Haake asserted that Arden Hills has <br />sandy soils which is a good permeable soil so curb and gutter (which would result in additional <br />costs) is not necessary to instalL She advised that Mounds View reduced the street width as <br />requested by the residents which reduced the assessment costs by 75%, Then, over next two <br />weeks, the residents said the neighborhood and aesthetics were the real issues and the Council <br />then agreed to a 24 foot wide street without curb and gutter with no assessment since MSA funds <br />will be applied. <br />. <br />