Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> . Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, "... it mllst state in writing the reasons for <br /> the dcnial at the time that it denies the request." <br /> Recommendation, The Planning Commission, in Planning Case 98-11, recommends denial <br /> of the rear yard setback variance (parking lot one foot provided, when five fcct is required) <br /> based on the "Rear Yard Setback Variance (parking lot)" section of the Staff report dated <br /> April 1, 1998 <br /> The Planning Commission, in Planning Case 98-11, also recommends approval ofa variance <br /> for the existing sign (shared off premises sign) based on the "Findings - Variancc (Signagc)" <br /> section of the Staff report datcd April I. 1998, conditioned on the following: <br /> 1. The size of any pylon sign is limited to 100 square feet in area per face (two faces). <br /> 2. Prohibition of a second pylon sign. <br /> The Planning Commission, in Planning Case 98-11, lastly recommends approval ofthc lot <br /> split, conditioned on the following: <br /> 1. Provision of a five (5) foot setback (parking) on the north edge of the Southerly <br /> Parcel. <br /> 2. Provision of the necessary cross vehicular access casement, in a form acceptable to <br /> the City Attorney, to bc recorded with the lot split. <br /> . J. Provision of the necessary drainage and utility easements, in a form acceptable to the <br /> City Attorney, to be recorded with the lot split. <br /> 4. Payment of the necessary park dedication fee. if yet not paid. <br /> Updates. The applicant has provided a revised survey which shows the provision of a five <br /> (5) foot setback on the nonh edge of the Southerly Parcel (Exhibit D). The applicant has <br /> provided a draCt cross vehicular access easement whose form has been reviewed and <br /> approved by the City Attorney (Exhibit E). The applicant has also provided a draft drainage <br /> and utility casements whose f(xm has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney <br /> (Exhibit F). Lastly, the Parks and Recreation Director has reviewed the subject property and <br /> has determincd that it had previously paid its park dedication fcc, therefore, none are <br /> required. <br /> . <br />