CCP 12-14-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, - Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, "... it must state in writing the reasons . for the denial at the time that it denies the request." Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #98-29, Side Yard Setback Variaoce, (5 feet in lieu of the proposed 4 feet 6 inches, when 10 feet is required) for a porch which is to be left open and never enclosed. Updates. The applicant has agreed to the reduction of 6 inches in width brining the proposal to 9 feet 6 inches by 12 feet (114 square feet) with a 5 foot variance request. The applicaot has submitted revised plans attached in Exhibit A. Case #98-32, Site Plan (minor building addition), Cardiac Pacemakers Inc., 4100 Hamline A venue Request. The petitioner is requesting approval of a site plan to allow for a minor expansion in Building B (17,520 square feet) at their campus which is located at 4100 Hamline Avenue (Exhibit B), Background. The expansion would not be seen by adjoining parcels or the public right- of-way. The building addition meets all the required setbacks and the exterior would match the existing exterior of Building B. The site currently has 1,265 parking spaces which is 109 parking spaces more than what is required to accommodate the proposed . expansion to Building B. The building meets the height, floor area ratio, and lot coverage requirements. Deadline for Agency Actions. The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 13, 1998. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by Tuesday, Jaouary 12, 1999 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period, The additional review period would extend to Friday, March 12, 1999. The City may, with the petitioners consent, extend the review period beyond the Friday, March 12, 1999 date. Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners request, "... it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request." Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #98-32, Site Plan, subject to the provision of sediment and erosion control measures adjacent to the affected area for development. Updates. The addition will eliminate an entrance currently being used, The applicant proposes to convert an emergency exit located to the North of the addition into a new entraoce for employees (Exhibit B). The new entrance will be aesthetically improved with glass doors, a small caoopy, aod lighting along a new sidewalk. An existing . watermain aod fire hydraot are currently located where the building is proposed. The