My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-13-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 09-13-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:12 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:12:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br />11 <br /> <br />proposed auditorium. The light fixtures will be of the same nature as those currently existing on <br />the campus. The rooftop equipment will be on the previously approved expansion to Building E <br />and will be screened. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall advised that staff recommended approval of Planning Case 99-15, Master <br />PlanIPlanned Unit Development amendment, conditioned on: <br /> <br />1. The 29 parking spaces shown as proof of parking be provided if the use of the <br />auditorium changes. <br />2. Provide erosion control in the area that will be disturbed. <br />3. Lighting meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance Section V, E, 3, a, b, c, <br />andd. <br />4. Rice Creek Watershed District Approval. <br /> <br />With regard to condition number four, Ms. Randall stated that the applicant had indicated that <br />they have received the Rice Creek Watershed District approval. <br /> <br />If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, then it would be <br />heard at the September 13,1999, regular meeting of the City Council. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson stated that given the fact that the applicant will be combining the property to the <br />north with the campus, there should be adequate proof of parking. He asked how the use of the <br />auditorium would be monitored. Ms. Randall stated that, although the campus was private <br />property, regular complaints about parking would trigger inspections and the requirement to <br />construct the proof of parking areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Dave Reimers, Guidant Corporation, stated that before parking becomes an issue, the <br />company hears from the employees what is needed. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson closed the public hearing at 9:07 p.m., as no one else wished to address the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rye moved, seconded by Commissioner Sand to recommend approval of <br />Planning Case 99-15, Master Plan/Planned Unit Development amendment, conditioned <br />on: <br /> <br />1. The 29 parking spaces shown as proof of parking be provided if the use of <br />the auditorium changes. <br />2. Provide erosion control in the area that will be disturbed. <br />3. Lighting meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance Section V, E, 3, <br />a, b, c, and d. <br />4. Rice Creek Watershed District Approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson asked if the parking would still be short by 29 spaces when the lots to the <br />north and east were included. Ms. Randall stated that the applicant is not planning to construct <br />the parking lot to the north. The site will be short 29 spaces when the proposed auditorium and <br />addition to building E is completed. Commissioner Nelson asked when the lot to the east would <br />be constructed. Ms. Randall stated that this lot would be constructed along with the building <br />once the permit was approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.