Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14, 1998 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />from the building. The Building Inspector has been in discussion with the contractor about that <br />issue and it appears they will be relocated near the sidewalk. <br /> <br />_11s. Randall advised that~taff recomme.llded approval of PI arming Case #98-32, Site Plan, <br />subject to the provision of sediment and erosion control measures adjac.ent to the affected area <br />for development, the fire hydrant be relocated to a location along the existing sidewalk per <br />approval by Staff, and that the watermain be relocated at least 10 feet from the proposed and <br />existing building per approval by Staff. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended <br />approval of Planning Case #98-32, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., 4100 Hamline Avenue, Site Plan, <br />subject to the recommendations indicated by Staff. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone noted that the neighbor expressed concern with parking since it has been <br />overflowing into the residential area during special events. <br /> <br />Dave Reimer, Guidant, stated that he spoke with that resident and resolved his concerns. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Plarming Case #98-32, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., 4100 <br />Hamline A venue, Site Plan, subject to the provision of sediment and erosion <br />control measures adjacent to the affected area for development, the fire hydrant <br />being relocated along the existing sidewalk per approval by Staff, and the <br />watermain be relocated at least ten feet from the proposed and existing building <br />per approval by Staff. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />3. Planning Case #98-31, City of Arden Hills, Zoning Code Amendment <br /> <br />Ms. Randall explained that the City of Arden Hills requested approval of an amendment to the <br />Zoning Ordinance. The amendment would clarifY that substandard sized lots which existed prior <br />to the adoption of the Gateway Business District (GBD) and the ordinance being created. She <br />reviewed the properties involved which were in existence prior to the adoption of Ordinance <br />#291. Ms. Randall noted that it also includes a provision to address lots made substandard by a <br />governmental taking so they are exempt from the minimum size requirement of that district. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall explained that the Gateway Business District required that single parcels have at <br />least ten acres to be considered developable. Several parcels exist which existed prior to the <br />development of this district that have less than the required ten acres. The proposed Code <br />change would allow these properties to be considered developable. The Code change would also <br />allow parcels that were reduced below the minimum size as a result of a governmental taking to <br />be considered developable. The Code change would not allow a parcel to be subdivided below <br />the minimum size requirement and be considered developable. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall reviewed the suggested wording changes and advised that Staff was recommending <br />approval of PI arming Case #98-31, Zoning Code arnendment. The Plarming Commission <br />unanimously recommended approval of PI arming Case #98-31, City of Arden Hills, Zoning Code <br />arnendment based on the modified language to Section V, K, 5, a, (5), (b) to read "Are <br />substandard in size as a result of the acquisition or condemnation by a governmental entity for <br />