Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14, 1998 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />public purpose and remain in separate ownership from adjacent lots from the date of such <br />acquisition or condemnation." <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />_.Mayor Probst inquiredregardiI]gthe in!j::lact to e.xisting buildings that W.ill1tJo be modified. _ Mr. <br />Ringwald explained that they currently have a legal non-conforming lot since they existed prior <br />to adoption of the ordinance. He advised that the City Attorney stated that this modification <br />would make them legal uses and that this was a way to deal with those existing properties. Mr. <br />Ringwald noted that this will provide a level of protection to those property owners that they <br />currently do not have. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated his concern that no tiny parcels be left that could potentially become <br />developable by this exception. Mr. Ringwald stated that he had the sarne question but the City <br />Attorney drafted this with only these specific parcels in mind, as indicated by Ms. Randall. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked if the reason to include language regarding these parcels is that <br />they are under separate ownership. Mr. Ringwald stated that is correct and advised that the <br />easterly billboard for Neagele is on an eight acre parcel. However, since it is not under separate <br />ownership from the remaining Naegele parcels, this ordinance would not provide separate <br />buildability to that lot. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Keim seconded a motion to <br />approve Plarming Case #98-31, City of Arden Hills Zoning Code Amendment, as <br />presented by Staff and to direct Staff to prepare an Ordinance to be executed and <br />published. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />B. Resolution #98-77, Adopting the 1999-2003 Capital Improvement Plan <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger explained that the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) historically began being <br />developed in April and May and was ratified in June by consensus at the worksession. He <br />explained that Staff has looked at the CIP and felt additional information should be provided to <br />help others understand what the CIP is about, how the various projects or acquisition of <br />equipment relates to each other, and where the funding will come from. He noted the summary <br />statement has been provided but not an in-depth packet of information as being reviewed tonight. <br />Mr. Fritsinger requested the ratification of the summary portion which is used for planning <br />purposes. He noted that the 1999 section is consistent with what the Council has seen throughout <br />the budget process. Several items were moved out since the current equipment is in adequate <br />condition and can be used. Also, some numbers have been clarified. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger stated that there is work to do on this document to make it workable for the <br />general public but Staff wanted the Council to receive this information for review. The Council <br />was asked to adopt Resolution #98-77 which would adopt the 1999-2003 Capital Improvement <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked about a year 2000 plarmed expenditure of $1.5 million for a e <br />maintenance facility and whether it is realistic to show this expenditure in the year 2000. Mr. <br />Fritsinger stated that the conversations held earlier identified the year 2000 to begin construction <br />