My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 01-25-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 01-25-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:14 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:14:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 6, 1999 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Ms. Randall advised that Staff is recommending approval of Planning Case #98-35, Minor _ <br />Subdivision, subject to tlJe recording oftlJe subdivision in the form of a Registered Land Survey. <br />If the Plarming Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, it would be heard <br />at tlJ~ Monday, January 25, 1999, regular meeting oftlJe City Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Donald Palme explained that the reason for this subdivision request is because he discovered <br />that his air conditioning unit had been installed on the property line. He expressed his concern <br />that, if the property owner to the south were to sell her property, and the new owner wanted to <br />install a fence, the location of the air conditioning unit could be a problem. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Rye closed tlJe public hearing at 7:42 p.m., as no one else wished to address tlJe <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duchenes moved, seconded by Commissioner Sand, to recommend <br />approval of PI arming Case #98-35, Donald and Carole Palme, 1370 Arden Oaks Drive, <br />Minor Subdivision. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand asked Staff what made this Planning Case a public hearing, as opposed to <br />other subdivisions. Mr. Ringwald explained requests for minor subdivisions require a public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> <br />This Planning Case will be reviewed at the Monday, January 25, 1999, regular City Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE #98-36 - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS - ADULT USE ORDINANCE- <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald explained that Staff and tlJe City Attorney, John Miller, request tlJat the Planning <br />Commission review and discuss tlJe draft Ordinance for adult uses. The City Council, on March <br />9, 1998, adopted Ordinance #305 placing a one-year moratorium on tlJe sitting of adult use <br />establishments within tlJe City of Arden Hills. The City Council, in Section 3 of that Ordinance, <br />directed Staff to conduct a study and forward tlJe conclusions oftlJat study to the Planning <br />Commission for its consideration. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated tlJat the agenda packet included information which goes through everything <br />Staff could find related to adult use. These items include newspaper clippings, court case <br />decisions and City Codes. Additionally, tlJe packet included studies from Indianapolis, St. Paul <br />and Phoenix, State Attorney General's report, as well as others. Staff intends to base tlJe <br />Ordinance on these studies and reports. One item which needs to be taken into account when <br />dealing with this type of use is cause and aeffect. The Courts have generally upheld tlJat otlJer <br />people's studies can be utilized when making findings since tlJe City can reasonably assume iliat ... <br />the same conditions would occur within its jurisdiction. ., <br /> <br />Also included in tlJe agenda packet was a color map of the City of Arden Hills which shows all <br />tlJe Residential Zoning Districts within the City. The map highlights the B-1 and B-4 Zoning <br />Districts and depicts the 1000- foot buffer from these areas, as outlined in the draft Ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.