Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JANUARY 6, 1999 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Historically what has developed, in all attempt to regulate the industry as a whole, is tlJe e <br />recognition of the notion tlJat tlJere are adverse secondary affects from this type of business. A <br />number of cities undertook studies to determine what these adverse secondary affects are and <br />concluded tlJat they include all increase in crime and a decrease in property value. <br /> <br />The role of the Planning Commission and the City Council is to determine if these recognized <br />secondary affects would apply to the City of Arden Hills. Generally, if there is a rational basis to <br />conclude that these affects would apply, Courts would uphold this decision. The second step is <br />to determine to what extent tlJese adverse secondary affects should be regulated. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Rye asked if what is being proposed would be a specific use within tlJe B-4 Zoning <br />District. Mr. Ringwald explained it would be a special use within the B-1 and B-4 Zoning <br />Districts. Acting Chair Rye requested confirmation tlJat there would be no explicit setback <br />requirements other than the rationale of allowing them in the B-1 or B-4 Zoning Districts. Mr. <br />Ringwald indicated tlJere would only be tlJe I,OOO-foot setback from a Residential Zoning <br />District. <br /> <br />Acting Chair Rye asked how tattoo parlors are handled within the City. He also asked if there <br />would be any reason to handle tlJem differently, such as being more restrictive, or folding them <br />into the Ordinance. Mr. Ringwald stated that this type of businesses would not need to be folded <br />into tlJe Ordinance. This type of business is treated no differently tlJan any other, with tlJe <br />exception of public health concerns which are handled by tlJe Rarnsey County Public Health <br />Office. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Acting Chair Rye asked at what point did the Courts decide that this would be a protected use. <br />Mr. Miller stated that, during a case in 1963, the Supreme Court made the distinction between <br />obscenity and everything else. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson asked iftlJe zoning map presented to tlJe Commission is the newest map. <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that it is. Commissioner Nelson referred to the addition oftlJe <br />NeighborhoodlBusiness Zoning District and asked why this does not appear on the map. Mr. <br />Ringwald explained that the new zoning district was added under tlJe Comprehensive Plan. The <br />Comprehensive Plan is a long range document and the next step is implementing it. Part of this <br />implementation would include developing the NeighborhoodlBusiness Districts aIld changing the <br />zoning on particular parcels. Commissioner Nelson asked if these changes would affect tlJe <br />proposed Ordinance. Mr. Ringwald stated they would not. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson noted that, ifBetlJel College has a seminary which would be considered a <br />church, this would be in conflict with the separation from sensitive users restriction. Mr. <br />Ringwald stated tlJat, in reality, if an adult use business were located in tlJat area, BetlJel Collage <br />would no longer be there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson referred to the bottom of page 14 of the draft Ordinance and confirmed <br />tlJat alcohol is not allowed at adult use businesses. Mr. Ringwald stated that this is correct. <br />Commissioner Nelson wondered if this would be going a step too far. Mr. Ringwald indicated <br />tlJat Staff felt tlJe restriction was consistent and appropriate. <br /> <br />e <br />