Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 3, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Mr. Wahlberg noted that the three-season porch slopes back and his desire had been for the new <br />roof to conform to this slope. Chair Erickson asked if the three-season porch has a shed roof. <br />Mr. Wahlberg stated that it does. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand moved, seconded by Commissioner Baker to recommend denial of <br />Planning Case #98-30, Corner Side Yard Setback Variance (19 feet 9 inches proposed, <br />when 40 feet is required) for an attached garage (storage space), based on the "Findings - <br />Corner Side Yard Setback Variance (garage)" section of the Staff report dated February 3, <br />1999. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand noted the primary reasons for denial were that the original purpose was to <br />regain lost storage space, the findings that the structure could be relocated elsewhere on the <br />property in a code conforming location, and the absence of an undue hardship. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />This Planning Case will be reviewed at the Monday, February 22, 1999 City Council meeting. <br /> <br />PLANNING CASE #98-36 - CITY OF ARDEN HILLS - ADULT USE ORDINANCE- <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Chair Erickson confirmed that the Planning Case was announced in the January 25, 1999, <br />publication of the Bulletin. The public hearing was opened at 8:07 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald explained that the City of Arden Hills requests that the Planning Commission <br />recommend approval of Ordinance #311 which would establish specific regulations for Sexually <br />Oriented Businesses. The existing Ordinance had been found to be inadequate in relation to the <br />pressures occurring in the Metropolitan area. Staffhad felt an update would be appropriate as the <br />City matures and these types of businesses wish to locate in areas such as Arden Hills. The City <br />cannot regulate these businesses from locating in the City however; these businesses must <br />compete, as others do, for existing areas within the community. <br /> <br />The City Council had directed StafIto conduct a study and forward the conclusions of that study <br />to the Planning Commission for its consideration. The Staffhad concluded that study and <br />presented it, along with other studies, maps, diagrams, case reports and Ordinances from other <br />cities, to the Planning Commission for discussion at its January 6, 1999, regular meeting. <br /> <br />The Ordinance, in Section 3.01, limits the location of adult uses to those parts of the B-1 and B-4 <br />Zoning Districts that are greater than 1,000 feet from any residential Zoning District. The <br />licensing section of the Ordinance only allows the issuance of one license per building or parcel <br />and that no more than three licenses be issued at anyone time. <br /> <br />At the January 6, 1999, regular meeting, the Planning Commission had nine topical areas that it <br />requested be examined in further detail by the Staff prior to the consideration of this topic at the <br />public hearing. These areas were: <br />