Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 3, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAfT <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Clustering. The Planning Commission asked whether these adult businesses should be <br />clustered or dispersed within the Zoning District. The Ordinance would neither cluster <br />nor disperse these uses. The Ordinance would allow for three licenses to be granted <br />within the City. These licenses would need to meet the locational requirements of the <br />Ordinance as well as not being located within the same building or on the same parcel as <br />another license. The Staff would conclude that, given the limited amount of commercial <br />land in the City, this would be the most appropriate solution to the clustering issue. <br /> <br />2. Day Care. The Planning Commission asked if day cares should be buffered and, if so, <br />what would happen if one moved near an existing adult use. The Staff would conclude <br />that only those uses that are occurring in the residential Zoning Districts should be <br />buffered from these uses. Iflarge cornmercial day cares were to be buffered from these <br />uses their location could negatively impact these uses to the point that none could occur <br />in the City, which is not permissible. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />B-1 Zoning at Bethel College. The Planning Cormnission asked, if the B-1 zoning <br />designation was eliminated from this Ordinance, would enough land be available to meet <br />the necessary legal requirements. Based on the conclusions of the Crystal case that 5% of <br />the land would be allowable, the City Attorney believes that the B-1 Zoning District <br />could be eliminated from the available Zoning Districts for these uses and withstand <br />judicial scrutiny. The remaining area for these uses would then be the B-4 Zoning <br />District. The B-4 Zoning District makes available to these uses greater than six percent <br />of the cornmercially zoned land in the City. Additionally, it is important to note that the <br />City of Arden Hills is, for the most part, a residential community with very little land <br />available for any type of commercial activities. <br /> <br />4. Regulating Number and Cost of License. The Planning Commission asked if the <br />number and cost of the licenses for these uses could be managed. The number oflicenses <br />is being proposed to be limited to three licenses for the entire City. The cost of licenses <br />will be set by the City Council so that the expenses incurred by the City for background <br />investigations would be adequately covered. The cost of these investigations can run <br />between $1,000 to $10,000 per year and will be determine through discussions with the <br />Ramsey County Sheriff Department. The cost of the license should not be included in the <br />Ordinance. The cost should be set by a resolution at the beginning of each year. <br /> <br />5. Adult Use Mini-Mall. The Planning Commission asked whether an adult use mini-mall <br />would be a desirable land use. The Staff would conclude that it would not be an <br />appropriate land use. Therefore, the Ordinance would allow for the issuance of only one <br />license to an individual building or parcel. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Definition Consistency. The Planning Cormnission asked Staff to compare the proposed <br />definitions in the Ordinance to those definitions used in other city's Ordinances, <br />particularly Crystal's and St. Paul's. The City Attorney has reviewed the definitions to <br />ensure consistency. <br /> <br />7. Buffering by Zoning District versus Distance. The Planning Cormnission asked if <br />buffering by zone or by distance was more effective. The Staff would conclude that <br />buffering by using both is most appropriate for the City. The Staff concluded through its <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br />