Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 3, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT 9 <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson asked if this was the reason for the conclusions of issue #9, Leasing and <br />Ownership Information. Mr. Ringwald stated that it was not. He indicated that he had not been <br />sure what the intent of the Planning Commission had been. He noted that the City would be <br />obt~g the name of a property owner during the application process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand noted that the initial definition of an adult use is that the business derives 25 <br />percent of its gross monthly receipts or devotes 25 percent of its floor area to adult uses. He <br />asked how the 25 percent figure had been established. Mr. Miller stated that this limitation had <br />come from other Ordinances. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand wondered what would happen if a business attempted to avoid being <br />regulated by this Ordinance by devoting less than 25 percent of its floor space or gross receipts to <br />adult uses. For example a gas station which may decide to have a magazine rack, selling adult <br />magazines, which involves only 10 percent of floor space. He asked if, under this Ordinance this <br />would be allowable. Mr. Ringwald stated that it would be. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand asked if there were other Ordinances within the City which would control <br />this type of situation. Mr. Ringwald stated that there was not. He stated that the 25 percent <br />limitation is the standard and he would not recommend lowering this limit without a rational <br />reason or further analysis. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand stated that he does not disagree with the percentage as it had been set <br />according to factual experience and case studies. He stated that he had posed the issue so if it <br />were to come up, residents would be aware of why this is allowed. Mr. Ringwald noted a good <br />example of this situation would be a video store. He indicated that most video stores have a <br />small section devoted to adult movies and these are generally not regulated. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller noted that the process of regulating adult uses is currently evolving and it would be <br />difficult to determine what requirements would be upheld by the Courts. He indicated that <br />Commissioner Sand's example of a gas station would most likely fall under the adult bookstore <br />regulation portion of the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand commented that, given the recent events in White Bear Lake, this Ordinance <br />is needed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duchenes referred to Sections 3.05, c, 6; 3.06, b; and 3.15 of the Ordinance and <br />noted there were references to corporation and partnership applicants. She suggested changing <br />this to corporations, Limited Liability Company and other business entities since there are so <br />many different forms of business entities. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald surmnarized the comments made by the Planning Commission to the Ordinance. <br />He confirmed that the Planning Commission agrees with Staffs comments regarding: clustering <br />and \lay cares; eliminating the B-1 Zoning District; all the comments and suggestions regarding <br />issues number four through eight; and include issue number nine, leasing and ownership <br />information, in the application. He also confirmed the expansion of Sections 3.05, c, 6; 3.06, b; <br />and 3.15 to include all corporations, persons, etc. <br />