My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 02-22-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 02-22-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:16 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:14:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 3, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT 8 <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald noted that, pursuant to Section VIII, D, I, b of the Zoning Ordinance a "...four - <br />fifths (4/5's) majority of the full Council is required for action to amend the Zoning Ordinance. .. <br />In the event an application for amendment is approved, an appropriate amending Ordinance shall <br />be executed and published." <br /> <br />Chair Erickson closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m., as no one wished to address the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand complimented Staff on their accumulation of the necessary background <br />information the Commission needed in order to make a decision. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson referred to the B-1 Zoning District of Bethel College. He stated that, based on <br />the legal precedence of limiting the area and specifying Zoning Districts, it would make sense to <br />eliminate the B-1 Zoning District from the Ordinance providing the B-4 zoning District meets <br />the standards of the test of the amount ofland available. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald noted that, with regard to future rezonings, the City must always consider what <br />any worst case scenario could be, regardless of the zoning district involved. It will be the <br />responsibility of Staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council to carefully evaluate any <br />future rezonings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson referred to issue # I, Clustering, and asked if limiting the number of <br />licenses to three would be better than requiring a certain distance between the businesses. Mr. e <br />Ringwald explained that limiting the number oflicenses makes the issue easier to deal with due <br />to the limited amount of available business district areas that the City has, based on the large <br />extent of residential areas within the City. If there were a minimum setback between the uses, <br />the available area would be eliminated so quickly that it was Staff's opinion that it would be <br />problematic to establish a minimum setback. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson referred to issue #3, B-1 Zoning at Bethel College, and stated that he <br />would prefer the uses be limited to the B-4 Zoning District, since this area is larger than the area <br />allowed in Crystal. He asked if there were other cities which allowed less than six percent of <br />land for these uses. Mr. Ringwald stated that Staff is only aware of the Crystal situation because <br />it had been challenged and upheld in court. He indicated that Crystal's Ordinance dealt with the <br />large extent of single family homes within the cornmunity and small business district, which is <br />similar to Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson asked if Staff would recornmend limiting the uses strictly to the B-4 <br />Zoning District. Mr. Ringwald stated that Staff would. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson referred to the review of fmancial records and asked if it would be helpful <br />to include this requirement in the Ordinance. Mr. Ringwald stated that Staff felt it would not. <br />Most businesses would not be willing to give up their financial records to a governmental entity <br />and have this information become public information to their competitors. Mr. Miller pointed _ <br />out, another reason for not including this requirement was that the definition for adult uses is .. <br />quite broad. If a store were to sell a few off-color greeting cards, it could fall under the definition <br />of adult use and therefore would have to turn over its financial records to the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.