CCP 05-24-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. variance will be required. The proposed addition to Building E has a height of 26.4 feet, meeting the ordinance requirements. e The Zoning Ordinance in Section V, F, 8, prescribes the minimum building setback for the parcel in the I-I zoning district. The proposed buildings will meet the required setbacks except for future Building H, where 40 feet is proposed when 100 feet is required from the property line. For constmction of this building, the two CPI parcels will need to be combined or a variance will need to be obtained. Deadline for Al!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the complete application for this request on April 20, 1999. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue the City must act on this request by Friday, June 18, 1999. (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The additional review period would extend to Tuesday, August 17, 1999. The City may, with the petitioner's consent, extend the review period beyond the Tuesday, August 17, 1999 date. Lastly, if the City denies the petitioner's request, "... it must state in writing the reason for the denial at the time that it denies the request." Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #99-07, Master PlanlPlanned Unit Development amendment, subject to the following conditions: . I. Applicant provide documentation for permanent easement for the parking lot for review by the City Attorney, or provide proof ofparking by joining this property with the property to the north. 2. Provide erosion control in the area that will be disturbed. 3. Lighting meet the requirernents of the Zoning Ordinance Section V,E,3,a,b, c, and d. 4. Rice Creek Watershed approval. Notes. 1. Pursuant to Section V, L, 5, d, of the Zoning Ordinance a four/fifths (4/5's) majority of the full City Council is required to approve (modify) a Planned Unit Development. 2. Pursuant to Section VIII, E, 4, ofthe Zoning Ordinance no application which has been denied wholly or in part shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date of denial. Updates. The applicant modified the entrance to the proposed parking lot just prior to the Planning Commission meeting. The originally proposed plan entered onto Control Data's private drive. Staff recommended the applicant provide information showing the right to use the private drive. The applicant does have an agreement with Control Data however, preferred to relocate the drive entrance to enter from Fernwood Avenue. (Exhibit F) e