Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />ji <br />!t.:' <br />U'", <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 7,1999 <br /> <br />With regard to the Basics section ofthe draft zoning district, Chair Erickson stated that he felt . <br />that the height requirement should stay the same and building size limited by design <br />requirements and peaked roofs versus flat roofs. He expressed his belief that peaked roofs would <br />be appropriate at all the sites. He stated that the bulk and density requirements would need <br />additional testing ofthe sites to determine what floor to area ratio will work. The suggested ratio <br />may be more acceptable to smaller sites than the larger ones. He indicated that the lot and <br />landscape coverage requirements would be acceptable. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rye asked if it would be more efficient to bring up each issue in the draft and <br />allow comments from all the Planning Commission members prior to moving on to the next <br />issue. Commissioner Sand suggested that each of the Planning Commission members use the <br />chart in Exhibit A to indicate which category those uses should fall under. This chart could then <br />be submitted to staff to inform them of what uses the Commission feels should be permitted, not <br />permitted, or permitted under a special use. Staff could then develop a consensus from this <br />information. <br /> <br />With regard to the other issues within the draft, Commissioner Sand stated that he had not given <br />specific thought to every item in order to express an opinion this evening on the entire draft. He <br />stated that he would be willing to comment on each of staff s questions and send an E-mail or <br />letter back to staff. Mr. Ringwald suggested that the Planning Commission mark up their copies <br />of the staff report with comments and concerns and return these back to staff. The members of <br />the Planning Commission agreed. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Commissioner Rye asked Mr. Ringwald ifhe had a copy ofthe draft on computer. Mr. <br />Ringwald stated that he does. Mr. Ringwald asked if there should be a due date for the <br />comments from the Planning Commission. Mr. Ringwald requested that the comments be <br />returned to him by Friday, July 16,1999. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson asked ifthe members of the audience were provided with a copy ofthe staff <br />report and draft zoning district. Mr. Ringwald stated that they were not. Chair Erickson invited <br />the members of the audience to address the Planning Commission on the discussions this <br />evening. He noted that the initial goals for creating this zoning district were to help promote the <br />appropriate development of the sites identified in the Comprehensive Plan and try to continue the <br />unique character of Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sand suggested that the members ofthe audience could call the City Hall to <br />request a copy of the staff report. Mr. Ringwald stated that copies could be made this evening <br />for the audience. <br /> <br />Mr. Elwood CaldweU, 1451 Arden View Drive, asked what the current zoning is of the seven <br />sites under consideration. Mr. Ringwald read through the zoning designation of the seven sites <br />and the audience members were provided with a chart of this information. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked, since the Comprehensive Plan designates these sites as <br />Neighborhood Business, would the Comprehensive Plan supersede over the zoning district once e <br />the new zoning district is approved. Mr. Ringwald stated that this would be assuming that the <br />City knew what the Neighborhood Business District was, however, the Comprehensive Plan does <br />take precedence over the zoning district per State law. <br />