My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-16-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 08-16-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:35 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:24:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />A,~If'.~GVl A 73 <br /> <br />the Metropolitan Council to determine the status of the Comprehensive Plan update and if <br />possible provide the necessary data to the Metropolitan Council. If this is not possible, <br />then see the recommendation section of this memorandum. <br /> <br />Software Tailors. I will contact Software Tailors and arrange to have them perform <br />maintenance as needed on the City's computer system. <br /> <br />North Metro I-35W Corridor Coalition. I will coordinate with the NMI35WCC to <br />provide for an orderly transition from my role as Chair and represent the City at the July <br />28th meeting related to the Arden Manor discussion. Prepare maps for Mayor. <br /> <br />Computers. I will coordinate the purchase of the three computers. <br /> <br />After Mv DeDarture (see Tasks in mv Outlook oro,,,..m for the details on these tooics) <br />1. Setback Permits (Citywide - SW portion of City). The City should move on this topic <br />( administrative variances). I would recommend the hiring of a competent planning <br />consultant who is familiar with the City for this task. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. Shared Building Inspector (Citywide). The City needs to review the performance and <br />need for this position (change splits: now; 50-50, 2000; 75-25), if a decision is not made <br />by October 1" (60 days) then the City must participate next year with Shoreview. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Electrical Inspector (Citywide). The City needs to review the Electricill Inspector <br />position, as the contract is an annual contract. Is Roseville going to hire its own? Is the <br />inspector's performance adequate? <br /> <br />4. Code Enforcement - Vaughan, etal (GBD enhancement). There are numerous issues <br />related to this property (Safety of Tower, US West Tower, Horse Lady, Park Property, <br />Park Trail, etc.,). The primary driver at this point is Fox29's interest or lack thereot; in the <br />site. We have informed people that we would only be watching until Fox29 makes a <br />decision or December of 1999, which ever occurs first. A coordinated approach (Nancy, <br />Dave, and Tom) is necessary to successfully implement all portions of this issue. <br /> <br />5. SOB Licensing and Regulation (Citywide). The City should work with Shoreview staff <br />to determine appropriate license and investigative fees for these uses. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Effects on repeal of Amortization Law (Citywide). I would recommend the hiring of a <br />competent planning consultant who is fummaT with the City for this task. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.