My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-29-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 11-29-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:46 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 8,1999 <br /> <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />and Dunlap Street were not included in the projeet. Additionally, although Hamline Avenue <br />North had been included in the report, it would be an expensive roadway to include in the <br />projeet. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the improvements to these streets would include reeonstruetion of the <br />roadways, eonerete curb and gutter, storm sewer and pavement subdrainage systems. The only <br />deviation from past projeets would be the proposed width deviation. Mr. Brown indieated that <br />the eosts included in the report refleet the proposed new width standards. Adding four feet of <br />width to a roadway would add approximately 18 to 20 dollars per foot to the projeet. He noted <br />that Tiller Lane and Dunlap Street were both eonstrueted to 30 fcet and he was not sure why this <br />had been done. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone confirmed that the street widths were measured curb to curb. He <br />indicated that he could not recall a decision to make Tiller Lane and Dllillap Street narrower than <br />the standard. Mr. Brown stated that the measurements had been face to face. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that the project would include storm sewer and the issue to determine with this <br />work was whether or not to include ponding. Because of the topography of the area, the best <br />location for a pond would be west of Hamline Avenue. In order to facilitate proper drainage, a <br />large diameter pipe would have to be used. It may be possible to utilize a pipe with a shorter life <br />expectancy and smaller diameter, however, this could result in some minor street flooding during <br />heavy rain storms. Proposed pond A would trcat storm watcr from Ingerson Road, Carlton <br />Drive, Fernwood Street and Fernwood Court, which currently drain into Lake Josephine via the <br />ditch between Fernwood Court and Ingerson Court. If the City chose to not construct the <br />proposed pond, the current drainage system could be repeated with grit chambers. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst askcd where the water from pond A would run to. Mr. Brown stated that the water <br />would run through the ditch system along Highway 51 to Lake Johanna. Mayor Probst noted <br />that this water currently runs into Lake Josephine. He asked if changing this runoff pattern <br />would alter the elcvation of the lake. Mr. Brown stated that Lake Josephine receives most of its <br />water from the south and southeast and he did not believe that the proposed pond would create <br />any negative concerns regarding thc elevation ofthe lake. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated tlmt two locations for ponds had been considered, one north ofIngerson Road <br />and the other SOUtll ofIngerson Road. The pond to the north, proposed pond B, would treat <br />storm water from Tiller Lane, Cannon Avenue and Dunlap Street which currently drain into the <br />wetland located between Ingerson Road. This pond would be located in the existing wetlands. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that a nwnber of modifications for the drainage project could be made and he <br />suggested that the neighborhood and Water Quality Task Force may wish to evaluate these <br />options and make a recommendation. From a Capital Improvement point of view, Mr. Brown <br />stated that the proposed plan would be the most expensive, however, it would do the best job of <br />dealing with runoff water. <br /> <br />. Mr. Brown stated that three options for the 2000 Street Improvement Project had been <br />considered in the report. Package A included a full neighborhood rcconstruction with no pond <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.