My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-29-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 11-29-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:46 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - NOVEMBER 15, 1999 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Additional discussion items included the traffic volwnes as they relate to continuing <br />development in the Gateway Business District (GBD); the continued scheduling delays in <br />completing the Arden Hills portion of the project; MnDOT's support of Option 3; residential <br />home aequisition responsibilities; ramifications on the Cities of New Brighton and Mounds View <br />with additional traffic loading on I-35W; potential funding of more global transportation issues <br />being studied by the I-35W Corridor Coalition; and the future of tile mobile home park. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council t1mt Ranlsey County should be able to pursue Segment Two <br />of the Highway 96 Reconstruction Project and be able to proceed without further delay. <br /> <br />After further discussion, the City Administrator was directed to schedule a meeting between staff <br />and Jim Tolaas of Ramsey COWlty, to present thc City's ultimate preferred design concept and <br />request that they come up with a way to meet that design, and if they are not able to do so, to <br />inform them that the Council wanted the road rebuilt "as is" with a signalized intersection at <br />Highway 96 and 10 with no grade separation. <br /> <br />2000 Street Improvement Proiect. Feasibility Report Revisions <br /> <br />Mr. Brown distributed a bench handout showing proposed revisions to the draft Feasibility Study <br />for the 2000 Street Improvement Project, based on project costs for a 32-foot wide street, and the <br />various funding sources. Mr. Brown projected a $45 per assessable foot revcnue source. <br /> <br />Issues discussed included the creation of the Ingerson ponds and other drainage issues for water <br />quality and Rice Creek Watershed District funding considerations; projected budget revenue and <br />expenditure estimates; and inflationary ramifications for waiting until fiscal year 200 I to make <br />the proposed improvements. <br /> <br />Mr. Post advised Councilmembers of the available balance in Fund No. 409 (Non-Assessable <br />Road Improvements), which could be accessed to provide funding for any shortfall experienced <br />for fiscal year 2000 improvements. Mr. Post provided a history of the source ofthose funds, <br />including previous Minnesota Statc Aid (MSA) construction reimbursement and Army Reserve <br />utility access fees. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council that, at a minimwn, ponding and utility work be completed <br />in the ycar 2000, with additional work to Jollow, after determining a City policy for the width of <br />collector streets. However, Councilmembers determined that this caused a two-year construction <br />period for the residents to contend with. <br /> <br />Following further discussion, statfwas directed to present the entire scope ofthe proposed 2000 <br />Street Improvement project to residents at the public informational meeting tentatively scheduled <br />for November 30, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, showing the ponding and water quality <br />enhancements and presuming a thirty-two foot (32') street width. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.