Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 29, 1999 <br /> <br />D' ',~""!' t""~ t"'T <br />" / ~"""""''' <br />~c,.. ..; \. ' III <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />adding eight parking spaces to the parking area off of Round Lake Court, eliminating two . <br />parking spaces, and changing some of the parking stalls from perpendicular to parallel so the <br />semi-drivers should not have any problems maneuvering around the parked vehicles, Staff also <br />modified the parallel parking to 20 feet in length were the applicant proposed 24 feet. <br /> <br />The Minnesota Building Code requires seven handicap spaces for the proposed site, The original <br />plan only required six handicap spaces, The applicant has added one space in the front of the <br />building to accommodate the requirement, <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Case #99-23, planned unit <br />development amendment, to add vehicle parking spaces on the north side of the building, with <br />the following conditions: <br /> <br />1, One handicap parking space be added to the east side of the existing handicap parking. <br />2. The parking be constructed as needed per City staff request. <br />3. The parking in the loading dock area be removed when this tenant vacates the building. <br />4. The bay doors are not to be used once the parking in the loading dock area is in <br />place. <br />5. The areas between the parking and building be striped for no parking, <br /> <br />After reviewing interior plans, staff discovered the tenant would have one usable dock door, the <br />fourth door from the east. The space the tenant will use is slightly larger than that shown on the <br />~~ . <br /> <br />The percentage of office for the building as a whole would be 34 percent office and 66 percent <br />warehouse, The tenant that would bring the office percent up from 20 percent would be at <br />approximately 72 percent office and 28 percent warehouse. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst confirmed that the request was essentially for proof of parking, Ms. Randall stated <br />that this was correct. She indicated that the proposed tenant may not need the additional parking. <br />The intent of the applicant was that, if the other two tenants were to leave the building, he would <br />be able to advertise these spaces at the 20 percent office ratio, <br /> <br />Mayor Probst confirmed that the construction of the parking would only require striping, Ms, <br />Randall concurred, However, she noted that the eight additional parking spaces to the north east <br />would have to be constructed, Staff has recommended that this area remain natural landscaping <br />until such time that the parking is needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked if the applicant had reviewed and accepted staffs alternate plan, <br />Ms, Randall stated that staff had submitted the alternative plan to the applicant, however, the <br />applicant has not responded to this plan, She has assumed that the applicant does not have any <br />issues with the alternative plan, <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the building was currently short parking spaces. Ms. Randall . <br />stated that there were currently only two tenants in the building and the building was not short <br />any parking spaces at this time. <br />